2006
DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/5231.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Parallax View

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 969 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to critical realism, "retroduction" constitutes the main method of inference, which means that events are explained by postulating (and identifying) the mechanisms that are capable of producing them. The retroduction employed in critical realism is closely associated with Hegel's dialectics of necessity and contingency that, as observed by Zižek (2008), considers universal necessity as always retroactive and emerging out of the radical contingency of the process. Realist scholars are therefore expected to examine beyond the standard linear historical time and deal with the paradox of "a contingent actual emergency which retroactively creates its own possibility, in other words, only when the thing takes place can we 'see' how it was possible" (Žižek 2008:180).…”
Section: Research Background and Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to critical realism, "retroduction" constitutes the main method of inference, which means that events are explained by postulating (and identifying) the mechanisms that are capable of producing them. The retroduction employed in critical realism is closely associated with Hegel's dialectics of necessity and contingency that, as observed by Zižek (2008), considers universal necessity as always retroactive and emerging out of the radical contingency of the process. Realist scholars are therefore expected to examine beyond the standard linear historical time and deal with the paradox of "a contingent actual emergency which retroactively creates its own possibility, in other words, only when the thing takes place can we 'see' how it was possible" (Žižek 2008:180).…”
Section: Research Background and Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide variety of acts may be considered resistive, including the drawing of political cartoons (Sharp et al 2000), public protest, or infrastructural sabotage (Rose 2002). Some Marxist scholars criticize popular methods of resistance that seek greater inclusion in, or make demands on, the current political-economic system; they argue that such efforts amount to playing by the existing rules and surrendering to the logic of those who already use power in oppressive ways (Žižek 2004;Virno and Ricciardi 2005;Harvey 2008;Swyngedouw 2010aSwyngedouw , 2011. This dissatisfaction leads Swyngedouw (2011) to call for a stronger, more powerful, and more radical resistance to capitalism that may be able to redefine what is possible in transformative politics.…”
Section: Articulations Of Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholarship on alternative economies, including cooperatives, informal community economies, local currencies, collective property structures, and alternative media outlets, among other initiatives, has proliferated in recent years (DeFilippis 2003;Gibson-Graham 2003;Pickerill and Chatterton 2006;Healy and Graham 2008;Shantz 2009Shantz , 2013Wright 2010;White and Williams 2012). While alternative economies are often hailed for their ability to construct new, liberatory relationships that displace those that produce injustice, critics have noted how these new institutions sometimes operate in oppressive ways that actually reproduce historical inequalities (Žižek 2004;Curry 2005;Kelly 2005;Samers 2005). This important point has led some scholars to call for a more critical examination of alternative economies and more careful delineation between the types of alternative economies that exist.…”
Section: Articulations Of Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst for some authors much the same thing is meant by self and subjectivity a key shift in contemporary social theory has been towards seeing the individual caught up in more or less committed participation in a multitude of discursive activity (Butler 2005;Žižek 2006). That is, individuals partake in social languages that more or less fit what they are trying to say but the individual is obliged to use these languages if they are to be included in social exchanges.…”
Section: Peirce and Semiotics Today: A Short History Of Self And Subjmentioning
confidence: 99%