2007
DOI: 10.1080/14616700601056874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Paradox of Popularity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
23
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Mobile news browsing in different locations may present users with interfering signals such as chatter and noise and changing visual stimuli. Such a distraction can result in low attention to news; instead of increasing political knowledge, mobile news browsing on news websites and social media platforms can result in a less informed impression of a topic (Costera Meijer 2007). Shorter usage episodes of mobile news browsing (Nelson and Lei 2018;Knight Foundation 2016) and extensive scrolling in social media news feeds on a mobile (Oulasvirta, Rattenbury, Ra, & Raita 2012) can compromise information uptake even further.…”
Section: Mobile News Browsingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobile news browsing in different locations may present users with interfering signals such as chatter and noise and changing visual stimuli. Such a distraction can result in low attention to news; instead of increasing political knowledge, mobile news browsing on news websites and social media platforms can result in a less informed impression of a topic (Costera Meijer 2007). Shorter usage episodes of mobile news browsing (Nelson and Lei 2018;Knight Foundation 2016) and extensive scrolling in social media news feeds on a mobile (Oulasvirta, Rattenbury, Ra, & Raita 2012) can compromise information uptake even further.…”
Section: Mobile News Browsingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los medios online han sido bien acogidos por adolescentes y jóvenes debido a sus múltiples ventajas como el acceso segmentado, ágil y veloz a la información que se puede consumir de forma inmediata (Costera, 2007). Otros factores que parecen influir en su consumo serían la gratuidad (Casero-Ripollés, 2012; Cherian y Jacob, 2012), sin que se vea especialmente resentida la percepción de calidad o credibilidad (García Avilés, Navarro Maillo y Arias Robles, 2014; Catalina García, García Jiménez y Montes Vozmediano, 2015) que jóvenes y adolescentes otorgan a la información consumida en el soporte digital.…”
Section: El Consumo De La Información Y Las Noticias De Actualidadunclassified
“…Otros factores que parecen influir en su consumo serían la gratuidad (Casero-Ripollés, 2012; Cherian y Jacob, 2012), sin que se vea especialmente resentida la percepción de calidad o credibilidad (García Avilés, Navarro Maillo y Arias Robles, 2014; Catalina García, García Jiménez y Montes Vozmediano, 2015) que jóvenes y adolescentes otorgan a la información consumida en el soporte digital. Esto no significa que disminuya la demanda de calidad informativa, pues investigaciones como la de Costera (2007) entre adolescentes y jóvenes de Países Bajos (cuyo rango de edad oscila entre 15 y 25 años) indican que estos usuarios aprecian los tradicionales valores de fiabilidad e independencia de las noticias.…”
Section: El Consumo De La Información Y Las Noticias De Actualidadunclassified
“…However, respondents also revealed a great deal of idealisation in their speeches, meaning they tend to answer according to what is socially acceptable and expected in the aims of the study (Buckingham, 2000: 202), building a gap between discourses and practice. In a study with teenagers, Irene Costera Meijer (2007) of young people about the news. While youngsters demand high quality information (sacrosanctity of the news features) and "are very aware of the social status and civic importance that are attributed to quality news" (Costera Meijer, 2007), they prefer to access more soft and entertaining information, as they tend to exclude themselves as an audience.…”
Section: Understanding Young People and (Dis)informationmentioning
confidence: 99%