1953
DOI: 10.1107/s0365110x53001964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The packing of α-helices: simple coiled-coils

Abstract: frame at t = 0, i.e. with its origin at (r0, ~00, z0) in our basic frame and with its x axis perpendicular to our basic z axis and pointing directly away from it. It can be shown that we should put It should be remembered that (rs, ~, z~) should refer to a left-handed helix in a right-handed frame.I should like to thank Mr G. Kreisel for a number of interesting discussions and in particular for suggesting the use of Parseval's theorem at a crucial point.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
1,108
1
11

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,610 publications
(1,177 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
37
1,108
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been proposed that the association of SNAP-25 with synaptobrevin involves the interaction of ␣-helical domains via formation of intermolecular coiledcoil structures (Chapman et al, 1994;Hayashi et al, 1994). Such ␣-helices are distinguished by a characteristic pattern of hydrophobic residues, which are exposed along one side of the helix, generating an intermolecular hydrophobic core in the twostranded coiled-coil formation (Crick, 1953). Sequence comparison reveals that the periodicity of hydrophobic residues is well preserved in leech SNAP-25, despite the amino acid differences in this domain (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proposed that the association of SNAP-25 with synaptobrevin involves the interaction of ␣-helical domains via formation of intermolecular coiledcoil structures (Chapman et al, 1994;Hayashi et al, 1994). Such ␣-helices are distinguished by a characteristic pattern of hydrophobic residues, which are exposed along one side of the helix, generating an intermolecular hydrophobic core in the twostranded coiled-coil formation (Crick, 1953). Sequence comparison reveals that the periodicity of hydrophobic residues is well preserved in leech SNAP-25, despite the amino acid differences in this domain (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length of the ordered part of Spc42_1 is ∼100 Å, and the diameter of the Spc42_1 dimer is ∼24 Å at its widest point (CR-CR distances are ∼14 Å across the dimer). Residues at the core positions show canonical knobs-into-holes packing (57). Fitting Crick parameters for an idealized coiled coil to residues 67-128 of Spc42_1 gave a superhelical radius (R 0 ) of 4.91 Å, an a-position phase angle (φ) of 0.36 radians, and a superhelical frequency (ω 0 ) of -0.65 radians/amino acid (57, 58) ( Figure 5D).…”
Section: Many Coiled Coils But Few Other Domains Are Predicted Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of coiled-coils requires the wrapping of two or more amphipathic R-helices around each other in a lefthanded supercoil fashion; the helices may be aligned in either a parallel or antiparallel manner. The R-helices composing the coiled-coil structure are defined by a heptad repeat (denoted abcdefg) in which hydrophobic residues occupy the positions a and d and pack in a characteristic "knobs-intoholes" manner (6), forming the hydrophobic core ( Figure 1). Many studies (1,(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) emphasized the role of charged residues (typically in the e and g positions) in controlling the specificity of oligomerization and opened up the way to the de novo design of heterodimeric coiled-coils (13)(14)(15)(16)(17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%