1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00137534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Oxford Clinical Cataract Classification and Grading System

Abstract: A composite slit-lamp based system for the clinical classification and grading of cataract is described. Cataract features are classified morphologically, and individual features are graded by comparison with standard diagrams mounted adjacent to the slit-lamp. Attention has been paid to relevant aspects of measurement theory, with equal interval steps between the grades. The image degrading effect of the cataract is assessed using a 'resolution target projection ophthalmoscope'. The method may be used in conj… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
80
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several clinical systems of cataract grading have been suggested. [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70] Most of them use a set of standard photos of nuclear opacities and assess the proportion of the pupil occupied by the cortical/PSC opacities.…”
Section: Quantification Of Lens Opacity Measurements In Risk Factor Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several clinical systems of cataract grading have been suggested. [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70] Most of them use a set of standard photos of nuclear opacities and assess the proportion of the pupil occupied by the cortical/PSC opacities.…”
Section: Quantification Of Lens Opacity Measurements In Risk Factor Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence and severity of the cataract can be determined by trained graders comparing the photographs with a series of standards. Several of these systems exist, 1,[7][8][9][10] and most of them are based on input data from slit lamp images. Although some are very complete but difficult to apply clinically, 7 others focus on the possibility to quickly evaluate the cataract in a simple and reproducible way 1,8 or are designed to grade a specific type of cataract.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several of these systems exist, 1,[7][8][9][10] and most of them are based on input data from slit lamp images. Although some are very complete but difficult to apply clinically, 7 others focus on the possibility to quickly evaluate the cataract in a simple and reproducible way 1,8 or are designed to grade a specific type of cataract. 10 Currently, the most widely used system is the Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS III), 9 which evaluates the cataract using slit lamp images of the lens with either direct focal or retro illumination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7A), it is possible to see similarities with zones in classical anatomic drawings (Fig. 7B) (Duke-Elder and Wybar, 1961) and to identify bands that accord with the Oxford classification system (Sparrow et al, 1986). The outermost thin, bright band represents the capsule and epithelium and the adjacent dark band corresponds to C1a which contains newly synthesised fibre cells (Michael and Bron, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%