1950
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1950.tb06020.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ovarian Theca Cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1951
1951
1961
1961

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An argum ent in favour of this hypothesis might be found in the frequent combination of ovarian hyperthecosis and adrenal hyperplasia (Bergstrand, 1934;CAiningham, 1953;Philipp-Stange, 1954 a;Jailer and Van de Wiele, 1954;Abu Haydar, Laidlate, Nusonovich and Sturgis, 1954;Ten Berge, 1955;Philipp, Staemmler and Slange, 1955;Stange, 1957;Feher, Gyory, Less and Ldszlo, 1958;Jones and Scott, 1958). Shippel (1955) offered an entirely different explanation: once stim ulated hair follicles continue to function excessively, even after removal of the cause of the stimulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An argum ent in favour of this hypothesis might be found in the frequent combination of ovarian hyperthecosis and adrenal hyperplasia (Bergstrand, 1934;CAiningham, 1953;Philipp-Stange, 1954 a;Jailer and Van de Wiele, 1954;Abu Haydar, Laidlate, Nusonovich and Sturgis, 1954;Ten Berge, 1955;Philipp, Staemmler and Slange, 1955;Stange, 1957;Feher, Gyory, Less and Ldszlo, 1958;Jones and Scott, 1958). Shippel (1955) offered an entirely different explanation: once stim ulated hair follicles continue to function excessively, even after removal of the cause of the stimulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%