The other U.S. Border? Techno-cultural-rationalities and fortification in Southern Mexico

Abstract

This article proposes the concept of techno-cultural-rationalities to understand how border security is enacted and “technified” along the historically porous boundary between Mexico and Guatemala. Drawing on Herbert Marcuse’s description of how the technological apparatus transforms what is considered rational in a society, I examine how technology seeks to neutralize politics and instill rigid classifications on fluid and politicized realities in Mexico’s Southern Border Program ( Programa Frontera Sur). The effect of discursive maneuvers related to the Program leave the causes and conditions of migration aside and the victors of border fortification unremarked upon. The policy’s goals are partially and ambiguously accomplished amidst an array of practices, actors, objects, desires, and discourses mediated by and through the particularities of place, which circumscribe and define technological uses. In taking seriously the emergence of situated practices, which are themselves reconfigured by diverse political contexts, I make two inter-related arguments. The first is that technological rationality operates by administering scarcity through the production of finite securities contingent upon the renewal of spatial hierarchies. The second is that informality and transgression serve as idiomatic modes of governance. Provincializing Marcuse or, directing his work to place-based practices and trans-local modes of engagement, through the analytic of techno-cultural-rationalities buttresses the applicability of such an important thinker and provides critical insight into the reproduction of border regimes across different places.

The digital life of the #migrantcaravan: Contextualizing Twitter as a spatial technology

“…Far from deterring migrants from making the journey north, the aggressive enforcement operations have led to disastrous consequences, including: the need for migrants to take new and dangerous routes; reports of excessive use of force by migration authorities and police; and increased opportunities for illicit networks of human traffickers and drug smugglers (cf. Walker, 2018Walker, , 2020. Mexico, which now receives over $100 million a year for the Program, is in effect "the other US border".…”

Examining the Global North Migration Policies: A “Push Out – Push Back” Approach to Forced Migration

“…More and more of them are also being created in Europe, which, in addition to physical barriers (as in Greece, Hungary or around Ceuta and Melilla – Spanish territories located in Africa), is also developing invisible borders by means of electronic surveillance systems using advanced technological means at sea borders (Cimadomo, ; Campesi, b) or land borders – a good example is the Polish–Ukrainian section of the EU external border equipped with an improved electronic surveillance system from the time when Poland joined the EU (IP/09/17; Klaus, : 526). Both of these systems work in synergy at the US–Mexico border (Newell et al., ; Walker, ).…”

“…These agreements result in other governments assuming responsibility for protecting the external borders of the Global North countries, either by directly collecting remuneration for this or indirectly reaping other benefits. These agreements not only push physical borders but also lead to the externalization of migration policy and its instruments (Spijkerboer, ; Del Sarto, ; Walker, ; Campesi, b). They also include the construction and maintenance of detention centres, paid for by the Global North countries far beyond their own borders and far beyond the bounds of human rights.…”

Latino Studies, Latino/a/X futures: Provocations toward a prospectus

“…e.g. Castillo Garcia, 2003;Feldman and Olea, 2005;Flynn, 2002;Klein, 2003;Walker, 2018;cf. Andreas and Biersteker, 2003).…”