The origins of 12-month attachment: A microanalysis of 4-month mother–infant interaction

Abstract

A detailed microanalysis of 4-month mother-infant face-to-face communication revealed a fine-grained specification of essential communication processes that predicted 12-month insecure attachment outcomes, particularly resistant and disorganized classifications. An urban community sample of 84 dyads were videotaped at 4 months during a face-to-face interaction, and at 12 months during the Ainsworth Strange Situation. Four-month mother and infant communication modalities of attention, affect, touch, and spatial orientation were coded from split-screen videotape on a 1s time base; mother and infant facial-visual “engagement” variables were constructed. We used contingency measures (multi-level time-series modeling) to examine the dyadic temporal process over time, and specific rates of qualitative features of behavior to examine the content of behavior. Self-contingency (auto-correlation) measured the degree of stability/lability within an individual’s own rhythms of behavior; interactive contingency (lagged cross-correlation) measured adjustments of the individual’s behavior that were correlated with the partner’s previous behavior. We documented that both self- and interactive contingency, as well as specific qualitative features, of mother and infant behavior were mechanisms of attachment formation by 4 months, distinguishing 12-month insecure, resistant, and disorganized attachment classifications from secure; avoidant were too few to test. All communication modalities made unique contributions. The separate analysis of different communication modalities identified intermodal discrepancies or conflict, both intrapersonal and interpersonal, that characterized insecure dyads. Contrary to dominant theories in the literature on face-to-face interaction, measures of maternal contingent coordination with infant yielded the fewest associations with 12-month attachment, whereas mother and infant self-contingency, and infant contingent coordination with mother, yielded comparable numbers of findings. Rather than the more usual hypothesis that more contingency is “better,” we partially supported our hypothesis that 12-month insecurity is associated with both higher and lower 4-month self- and interactive contingency values than secure, as a function of mother vs. infant and communication modality. Thus, in the origins of attachment security, more contingency is not necessarily better. A remarkable degree of differentiation was identified in the 4-month patterns of “future” C and D infants, classified as resistant and disorganized, respectively, at 12 months. Only future D infants were emotionally distressed, with simultaneous positive and negative discrepant affect; only their mothers showed difficulty in sharing infant affect, particularly distress, and lowered their contingent coordination with infant facial-visual engagement. This lowered contingent coordination makes it more difficult for infants to come to expect that their emotional/attentional states can influence mothers to coordinate with them and thus compromi...

Struggling with one’s own parenting after an upbringing with substance abusing parents

“…Children with a secure attachment system employ more adaptive emotion regulatory strategies than those who have an insecure attachment system (Mikulincer, Shaver, & Pereg, 2003). The emotional development of the child is to a great extent dependent on predictable patterns of caring, and she will at a very early age develop clear expectations concerning her relation with her parents (Beebe et al, 2010). There is a greater risk that the upbringing of children whose parents have an active substance abuse will be characterized by unpredictability, a high degree of stress and situations in which the parents are experienced by the child as frightening (Burnett, Jones, Bliwise, & Ross, 2006; Ross & Hill, 2004).…”

Petrificación epistémica y la restauración de la confiabilidad epistémica: Una nueva conceptualización del trastorno límite de la personalidad y su tratamiento psicosocial

“…Visto desde lejos, micro-analíticamente (ej., Beebe et al, 2010) y mediante manifestaciones más globales (ej., DeWolf & van IJzendoorn, 1997;Isabella, Belsky, & von Eye, 1989;Kiser, Bates, Maslin, & Bayles, 1986;Mills-Koonce et al, 2007) de los cuidados sensitivos pueden ser vistos, en esencia, como actos de reconocimiento del self agente del niño. Es este reconocimiento que creemos que ofrece la ventaja cognitiva de asegurar el apego que ha sido consistentemente citado, aunque no, para nuestro conocimiento, estudiado habitualmente (ej., Crandell & Hobson, 1999;Jacobsen & Hofmann, 1997;Moss, Rousseau, Parent, St. Laurent, & Saintong, 1998).…”

Partnership Cultures: Beginning at the Beginning through Parenting

“…Contingent, attuned responses affect the young child's ability to regulate stress and allow the child to feel understood and connected to the outside world (Feldman, 2012). Feeling empathically recognized or as if one matters enables the beginning of a healthy formation of self (Beebe, 2010). Repeated over time, the child builds a feeling of safety and trust in the relationship and extends the knowledge from these repeated intersubjective interactions to the construction of social knowledge.…”