2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:cope.0000017962.76744.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Optimal Decentralisation of Government Activity: Normative Recommendations for the European Constitution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Massardi and Abrantes (2015) further state that in countries where subnational entities hold greater autonomy, it becomes necessary to harmonize the level of resources of those units in order to offer public services to the local population, thereby disassembling local inequalities. In this sense, smaller countries or regions should be more successful in meeting the social needs of their population (Breuss and Eller, 2004).…”
Section: Theoretical Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Massardi and Abrantes (2015) further state that in countries where subnational entities hold greater autonomy, it becomes necessary to harmonize the level of resources of those units in order to offer public services to the local population, thereby disassembling local inequalities. In this sense, smaller countries or regions should be more successful in meeting the social needs of their population (Breuss and Eller, 2004).…”
Section: Theoretical Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provides an explanation as to why "too much" decentralization creates difficulties for the internalization of inter-jurisdictional externalities and why economies of scale fall short of their goals. The same holds for a low level of decentralization, insofar as inefficiencies in the provision of public goods can be caused because local preferences are under-considered (Thießen 2000;Thießen 2003;Breuss & Eller 2004).…”
Section: Nonlinear Relationship Between Decentralization and Its Perfmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Also in the literature on the decentralization of government activities, several authors, such as Breauss and Eller (2004) and ThieBen (2000), consider a non-linear relationship, or, in other words, a curvilinear relationship, meaning that there exists an "optimal degree" of decentralization (ThieBen 2000; Breuss & Eller 2004). As mentioned in the previous section, decentralization does not always produce positive effects, which implies that there is basic tension over the appropriate level of decentralization, which comes from the trade-off between the realization of scale effects and the internalization of externalities, on the one hand, and the consideration of local preferences, on the other hand (Breuss & Eller 2004). This provides an explanation as to why "too much" decentralization creates difficulties for the internalization of inter-jurisdictional externalities and why economies of scale fall short of their goals.…”
Section: Nonlinear Relationship Between Decentralization and Its Perfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a more detailed discussion, see Alesina et al (2005b) and the extensive survey by Breuss and Eller (2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%