1978
DOI: 10.1016/0040-6090(78)90332-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The optical properties of CuInSe2 thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
29
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7), the corresponding gap energies were found to be Εgf = (1.03 ± 0.03) and Egi = 0.85 eV, respectively. Thus our results confirm the conclusion of Parkes [6] and W. Hörig et al [18] that the absorption behaviour immediately above the fundamental edge is more complicated and can be described by the existence of two optical transitions, one of them being an indirect transition with a characteristic energy below the direct gap energy.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7), the corresponding gap energies were found to be Εgf = (1.03 ± 0.03) and Egi = 0.85 eV, respectively. Thus our results confirm the conclusion of Parkes [6] and W. Hörig et al [18] that the absorption behaviour immediately above the fundamental edge is more complicated and can be described by the existence of two optical transitions, one of them being an indirect transition with a characteristic energy below the direct gap energy.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…6). The value of Eg is in good agreement with the earliest published data [18,19]. However, if we calculated αd, where αd is the value of α for direct transition obtained from the •relation (α hv) 2 as a function of hv for energies above 1.15 eV and plot it as a function of λ (dashed line in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Under the assumption that " $ 10 4 cm -1 for photon energies slightly above E g (as reported for CuInSe 2 [15]) the information depth of the optical reflection measurement is $ 2000 nm, which is in the range of the thickness of the investigated CIG(S)Se layers (note that we define the information depth to be the thickness from which 90% of the overall signal is 5 collected, and that all of our spectroscopies are governed by an exponential attenuation function). This explains the good agreement between the E g values estimated from the optical reflection and the bulk composition, since both probe the entire CIG(S)Se volume.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the assumption that α ≈ 10 4 cm -1 for photon energies slightly above E g (as reported for CuInSe 2 [16]) the information depth of the optical reflection measurement is ≈ 2000 nm, which is in the range of the thickness of the investigated CIGSe (CIGSSe) layers (note that for this and the following considerations the information depth is defined as the thickness from which 90% of the overall signal is collected). XAS (in total fluorescence yield mode) and XES have similar information depths ( ≈ 200 nm) (based on [9]).…”
Section: Fig 19 Schematic Presentation Of the Determined Band Gap Enmentioning
confidence: 94%