2020
DOI: 10.3389/fmech.2020.00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Optical Aspect of Errors in Measurements of Surface Asperities Using the Optical Profilometry Method

Abstract: The paper presents the impact of lighting type and direction on measurements of surface asperities using focus-variation microscopy. Particular attention was paid to the direction of lighting when using a light ring. It was pointed out that the lighting direction directly affects the values of the parameters Rt, Rz, and Rc. The article also presents the impact of a light polarizer on the surface topography parameters. It has been shown that the positioning of a sample with a regular and directed structure rela… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feature parameters characterize geometrical properties of motifs which may be associated with craters or dales created by electric discharge. Functional parameters allow to characterize geometric parameter—volume of the void and material with respect to surface core, peaks or valleys, what might be associated with craters [ 40 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature parameters characterize geometrical properties of motifs which may be associated with craters or dales created by electric discharge. Functional parameters allow to characterize geometric parameter—volume of the void and material with respect to surface core, peaks or valleys, what might be associated with craters [ 40 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case where contact stylus profilometry is either difficult or is not a preferred method, then contactless technology, such as confocal or interferometric is used. This was reported by many researchers, including De Groot [14], Foreman et al [15], Gomez et al [16], Kucharski et al [17] and Grochalski et al [18]. The issues related to non-contact surface measurement versus stylus measurements were presented e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…There are many methods for measuring surface topography, divided into two main groups: contact and contactless. Since it is difficult to achieve consistency between methods using different physical principles [ 30 ], it was decided to use a focus variation microscope with an appropriately selected lighting system [ 31 ], as shown in Figure 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%