2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The oldest handaxes in Europe: fact or artefact?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the recent discovery of la Boella [40] and Estrecho del Quípar [41] in Spain suggests pushing the starting point of European bifacial technology close to the 1 Ma mark (but see [42] for a critique of the chronology). Unfortunately, unlike la Noira, all of these other assemblages are too small for a statistically significant characterization of the industry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the recent discovery of la Boella [40] and Estrecho del Quípar [41] in Spain suggests pushing the starting point of European bifacial technology close to the 1 Ma mark (but see [42] for a critique of the chronology). Unfortunately, unlike la Noira, all of these other assemblages are too small for a statistically significant characterization of the industry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the chronostratigraphy of the site has been highly criticized (Jim enez-Arenas et al, 2011).…”
Section: Technocomplexes Between~16 And~08 Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low precision of existing radiometric results and broader reliance on relative dating techniques have made it difficult to correlate different sites and sections within the Guadix-Baza basin. Additional problems, such as the relatively low temporal resolution of the palaeomagnetic datasets, the unsuitability of some of the deposits in the basin for palaeomagnetism analysis due to remagnetisation effects, and confusion regarding the Plio-Pleistocene biostratigraphic succession, have also resulted in uncertainty over existing chronological schemes (e.g., Gibert et al, 2006;Agustí et al, 2007;Jim enez-Arenas et al, 2011;Oms et al, 2011). Consequently, there remains a need to develop a more reliable, numerical dating framework for the Guadix-Baza sedimentary record using widely applicable techniques that provide coverage over Early to Middle Pleistocene timescales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%