“…Among the most important weaknesses reported by different researchers have been the length of the questionnaire, the narrowness of conceptualisation and measurement and inconsistent findings (Miskel and Ogawa, 1988). The invalidity of some items, such as aloofness, the lack of underlying logic in its dimensions, ambiguity and vagueness of the middle climate, and the dilemma as to whether climate is a categorical or a continuous variable were identified as serious weaknesses by many scholars (Silver, 1983, Andrews, 1965Brown, 1964;Watkins, 1968;Thomas, 1976;Thomas and Slater, 1972;Brady, 1985;Feldvebel, 1964;Hayes, 1973;Cheng, 1991).…”