1968
DOI: 10.1177/0013131x6800400205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The OCDQ an Application and Some Implications

Abstract: This article discusses an application of the Organizational Climate Description Questionnaire in a particular research situation and presents a critique of the instrument as a research tool.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those who have tried to validate it tend to support the factorial structure of the instrument, but the categories of climate (open to closed) have come under considerable suspicion (Watkins, 1968).…”
Section: Teacher Moralementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those who have tried to validate it tend to support the factorial structure of the instrument, but the categories of climate (open to closed) have come under considerable suspicion (Watkins, 1968).…”
Section: Teacher Moralementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the organisational climate of schools has been conceptualised as an aspect of the social system dimension in a variety of studies. These either sought to determine the adequacy of a given conceptualisation as a descriptor of climate (Brown, 1965;Halpin and Croft, 1963;Hall, 1972 ) or examined the extent to which climate is associated not only with other aspects of the school social system (Kanner, 1974;Licata and Willower, 1975), but also with other types of school characteristics (Watkins, 1968;Thomas, 1976;Witkoskie, 1991) or with school achievement (Miller, 1968).…”
Section: Educational Administrator Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the most important weaknesses reported by different researchers have been the length of the questionnaire, the narrowness of conceptualisation and measurement and inconsistent findings (Miskel and Ogawa, 1988). The invalidity of some items, such as aloofness, the lack of underlying logic in its dimensions, ambiguity and vagueness of the middle climate, and the dilemma as to whether climate is a categorical or a continuous variable were identified as serious weaknesses by many scholars (Silver, 1983, Andrews, 1965Brown, 1964;Watkins, 1968;Thomas, 1976;Thomas and Slater, 1972;Brady, 1985;Feldvebel, 1964;Hayes, 1973;Cheng, 1991).…”
Section: Debates On Halpin and Croft 'S Ocdqmentioning
confidence: 99%