2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10900-019-00765-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nutrition Benefits Participation Gap: Barriers to Uptake of SNAP and WIC Among Latinx American Immigrant Families

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are further supported by the fact that only families who reported being able to use their SNAP benefits experienced smaller spikes in FI or no spikes at all when schools closed, suggesting that families who had trouble using these federal supports fared worse at onset of the pandemic. Plus, given that a large proportion of Power Packs families are Latinx, it is possible that some were ineligible for federal benefits due to their undocumented status, or reluctant to use these services due to fears of the public charge rule, which made obtaining a permanent residence more difficult for immigrants if they received public assistance such as SNAP (Barofsky et al, 2020;Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds, 2019;Pelto et al, 2020). Thus, some families may have been reticent or unable to rely on federal aid during the spring, which could have made Power Packs a more viable source of food assistance when they were struggling.…”
Section: Patterns Of Food Insecurity Amid the Pandemicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are further supported by the fact that only families who reported being able to use their SNAP benefits experienced smaller spikes in FI or no spikes at all when schools closed, suggesting that families who had trouble using these federal supports fared worse at onset of the pandemic. Plus, given that a large proportion of Power Packs families are Latinx, it is possible that some were ineligible for federal benefits due to their undocumented status, or reluctant to use these services due to fears of the public charge rule, which made obtaining a permanent residence more difficult for immigrants if they received public assistance such as SNAP (Barofsky et al, 2020;Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds, 2019;Pelto et al, 2020). Thus, some families may have been reticent or unable to rely on federal aid during the spring, which could have made Power Packs a more viable source of food assistance when they were struggling.…”
Section: Patterns Of Food Insecurity Amid the Pandemicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…84 A host of antiimmigrant threats are creating a climate of fear in many immigrant communities, making it more difficult for families to access federal nutrition programs and other safety net programs. 85,86 Pediatricians should provide up-to-date information to immigrant families about their eligibility for program benefits as well as what benefits do not count against immigration status. The Table provides information on eligibility for the federal nutrition programs (see footnote for immigrant eligibility).…”
Section: T a G G E D H 1 Policy Recommendations For Protecting And Strengthening The Federal Nutrition Programst A G G E D E N Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation for this study's finding is that Hispanic/Latinx households may be less likely to attend medical visits or to admit to FI on surveys, possibly due to uncertainty in the context of "public charge" and/ or fear of deportation, especially if there is mixed immigration status among family members [30,31]. Studies have shown that children living in immigrant families are less likely to access health care resources or public benefits, even if the qualifying child is a US citizen [28,[32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Third, during the second year, participants would have been 1 year older, making FI risk lower since households with older children are at lower FI risk [1]. A fourth possibility is that participants stopped admitting to FI on the paper-based survey, either due to survey fatigue, lack of confidence in clinic-based interventions, stigma, or fear of public charge [24][25][26][27][28][29]. A fifth possible explanation is that, because of the transient nature of FI, the screening occurred during a season or family circumstance in which the family had food security, although the HVS assesses FI over the previous 12month period, which would have accounted for all four seasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%