2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01297.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nursing hypothesis: An evolutionary account of emotional modulation of the postauricular reflex

Abstract: The postauricular reflex (PAR) is anomalous because it seems to be potentiated during positive emotions and inhibited during negative states, unlike eyeblink and other components of the startle reflex. Two evolutionary explanations based on simian facial emotion expressions were tested. Reflexes were elicited while 47 young adult volunteers made lip pursing or grimacing poses and viewed neutral, intimidating, or appetitive photos. The PAR was enhanced during appetitive slides, but only as subjects carried out … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The postauricular reflex was indeed specifically potentiated in response to the CS1 compared with the CS2 during acquisition, thereby reflecting appetitive learning at the psychophysiological level. This effect is consistent with prior findings that showed a greater postauricular reflex magnitude during presentation of pleasant/appetitive stimuli relative to neutral or unpleasant/aversive stimuli (Aaron & Benning, 2016;Benning, 2011;Benning et al, 2004;Dichter et al, 2010;Gable & Harmon-Jones, 2009;Hackley et al, 2009;Hess et al, 2007;Johnson et al, 2012;Sandt et al, 2009), and does not seem to have been related to participants' subjective hunger level. During the extinction phase, the postauricular reflex magnitude was no longer potentiated to the CS1 in comparison with the CS2, which suggests that its potentiation to the CS1 was conditioned to the pleasant odor delivery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The postauricular reflex was indeed specifically potentiated in response to the CS1 compared with the CS2 during acquisition, thereby reflecting appetitive learning at the psychophysiological level. This effect is consistent with prior findings that showed a greater postauricular reflex magnitude during presentation of pleasant/appetitive stimuli relative to neutral or unpleasant/aversive stimuli (Aaron & Benning, 2016;Benning, 2011;Benning et al, 2004;Dichter et al, 2010;Gable & Harmon-Jones, 2009;Hackley et al, 2009;Hess et al, 2007;Johnson et al, 2012;Sandt et al, 2009), and does not seem to have been related to participants' subjective hunger level. During the extinction phase, the postauricular reflex magnitude was no longer potentiated to the CS1 in comparison with the CS2, which suggests that its potentiation to the CS1 was conditioned to the pleasant odor delivery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Johnson, Geary, and Hackley (in preparation) offer a new account of why the postauricular component of startle exhibits a pattern opposite that of the eye blink component. They propose that the normal suppression of defensive reflexes during appetitive states is eclipsed by a reverse bias that is specific to the pinna musculature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnson, Valle‐Inclán, Geary, and Hackley () put forth the evolution‐based ‘nursing hypothesis’; the retraction of the ears that occurs in baby mammals in preparation for nursing may be associated with natural selection of circuits that primes the ear‐retraction motor pathway when viewing appetizing food or exposed breasts. Consistent with the nursing hypothesis, these authors found that the postauricular reflex was potentiated during appetitive images when participants pursed their lips, simulating a suckling posture (Johnson et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%