2017
DOI: 10.1080/17518369.2017.1374125
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The number and distribution of polar bears in the western Barents Sea

Abstract: Polar bears have experienced a rapid loss of sea-ice habitat in the Barents Sea. Monitoring this subpopulation focuses on the effects on polar bear demography. In August 2015, we conducted a survey in the Norwegian Arctic to estimate polar bear numbers and reveal population substructure. DNA profiles from biopsy samples and ear tags identified on photographs revealed that about half of the bears in Svalbard, compared to only 4.5% in the pack ice north of the archipelago, were recognized recaptures. The recaptu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coastal space use was overrepresented in this study: two-thirds of the polar bears were considered to belong to the local ecotype, while this group as a whole constitutes maybe only a tenth of the subpopulation 17 , 29 . While the analysis indicated broadly similar patterns in the amount and timing of swimming performed by local polar bears and offshore polar bears, differences may have been masked by the large individual variation in aquatic behaviour and relatively small sample for polar bears using the offshore strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Coastal space use was overrepresented in this study: two-thirds of the polar bears were considered to belong to the local ecotype, while this group as a whole constitutes maybe only a tenth of the subpopulation 17 , 29 . While the analysis indicated broadly similar patterns in the amount and timing of swimming performed by local polar bears and offshore polar bears, differences may have been masked by the large individual variation in aquatic behaviour and relatively small sample for polar bears using the offshore strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Monthly time in water was compared for the two main behavioural strategies that exist in the subpopulation 16 , 17 . Whether polar bears stay coastal or go offshore was classified by visual inspection of the tracking data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PFNA-mediated changes in PPARA functions are likely to increase in the future, as PFNA concentrations have increased 2.5% per year in Barents Sea polar bears during the period 2000–2014, whereas PFOS concentrations have been stable since 2009 72 . Furthermore, with the declining sea ice the Barents Sea, there is an increase in the use of offshore areas at the eastern Barents Sea by polar bears 73 , and bears using these areas have higher PFAS concentrations than those which stay close to the Svalbard Archipelago 74 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, where other species of marine mammals are present and there are opportunities to prey or scavenge upon them, polar bears have also been recorded feeding on species as diverse as harp seals (Pagophilus groenlandicus), hooded seals (Cystophora cristata), beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas), narwhals (Monodon monoceros), harbor seals (Phoca vitulina), walrus (Odobenus rosmarus), and bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) (Thiemann et al, 2008). However, as climate warming continues to have negative effects on sea ice throughout the circumpolar Arctic (Regehr et al, 2016) and the fast ice pupping habitat of ringed seals in particular (e.g., Stirling and Smith, 2004), the nutritional importance of species such as harp seals to small numbers of polar bears in the northern pack ice areas (Aars et al, 2017) may increase, even if only for brief periods during the summer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%