2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nucleosome Remodeling and Deacetylation Complex Modulates Chromatin Structure at Sites of Active Transcription to Fine-Tune Gene Expression

Abstract: SummaryChromatin remodeling complexes play essential roles in metazoan development through widespread control of gene expression, but the precise molecular mechanisms by which they do this in vivo remain ill defined. Using an inducible system with fine temporal resolution, we show that the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylation (NuRD) complex controls chromatin architecture and the protein binding repertoire at regulatory regions during cell state transitions. This is primarily exerted through its nucleosome … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

23
166
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(81 reference statements)
23
166
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sites found associated with all three MTA proteins were highly enriched for Chd4 and Mbd3 binding, consistent with these being core NuRD binding regions (Fig D). These sites were also enriched for marks of active promoters (H3K4Me3, H3K27Ac) and active enhancers (H3K4Me1, H3K27Ac, P300; Fig D and E), both of which are hallmarks of NuRD‐associated regions (Miller et al , ; Bornelöv et al , ). The same was true for sites bound by any two of the three MTA proteins (Fig EV2B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Sites found associated with all three MTA proteins were highly enriched for Chd4 and Mbd3 binding, consistent with these being core NuRD binding regions (Fig D). These sites were also enriched for marks of active promoters (H3K4Me3, H3K27Ac) and active enhancers (H3K4Me1, H3K27Ac, P300; Fig D and E), both of which are hallmarks of NuRD‐associated regions (Miller et al , ; Bornelöv et al , ). The same was true for sites bound by any two of the three MTA proteins (Fig EV2B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Mta1 and Mta2 both contain two distinct RBBP interaction domains, while Mta3 lacks the C‐terminal most RBBP interaction domain (Millard et al , ). The Mta1 and Mta2 proteins show minimal loss of stability in the absence of Mbd3, but Mta3 requires an interaction with Mbd3 to be completely stable (Fig EV4B; Bornelöv et al , ). It is possible that the additional interaction with an Rbbp protein confers stability to Mta1 and Mta2 in the absence of Mbd3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Ikaros family of TFs (including aiolos) play important roles in lymphocyte development and are often associated with the NuRD complex, an ATPdependent chromatin-remodelling complex involved in transcriptional repression. [13,14] Our DNA pull-down approach identified most of the components of the NuRD complex active at this locus (CHD4, MBD2, RBBP4, HDAC1, HDAC2 and KDM1A), all of which exhibit the same preferential binding to the A allele. Results consistent with these were also obtained by WB, EMSA and ChIP-qPCR, suggesting that transcriptional repression [7] associated with the NuRD complex is implicated in the pathogenesis of AS perhaps by regulating RUNX3 expression in CD8+ T-cells.…”
Section: Discussion (643)mentioning
confidence: 99%