2019
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2018100788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nucleosome Remodelling and Deacetylation complex suppresses transcriptional noise during lineage commitment

Abstract: Multiprotein chromatin remodelling complexes show remarkable conservation of function amongst metazoans, even though components present in invertebrates are often found as multiple paralogous proteins in vertebrate complexes. In some cases, these paralogues specify distinct biochemical and/or functional activities in vertebrate cells. Here, we set out to define the biochemical and functional diversity encoded by one such group of proteins within the mammalian Nucleosome Remodelling and Deacetylation (Nu … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(135 reference statements)
4
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the intense interest in the biological role and consequences of protein expression noise (Eling et al , ), our understanding has been hampered by the lack of evidence of the dynamic properties of such noise. Indeed, with the exception of live study of transcriptional bursting, our current understanding of biological protein and gene expression noise is based on snapshot measurements of variability across populations, such as phenotypic or molecular variability of individuals and/or variability in molecular abundance between cells (often determined by scRNA seq), variability of fluorescence in single cells (reviewed in Eling et al , ) or simply the inappropriate re‐expression of genes (Burgold et al , ). Similarly, the effect of miRNAs in controlling noise has been based on artificial synthetic systems or analysis of static measurements (Li et al , ; Siciliano et al , ; Schmiedel et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the intense interest in the biological role and consequences of protein expression noise (Eling et al , ), our understanding has been hampered by the lack of evidence of the dynamic properties of such noise. Indeed, with the exception of live study of transcriptional bursting, our current understanding of biological protein and gene expression noise is based on snapshot measurements of variability across populations, such as phenotypic or molecular variability of individuals and/or variability in molecular abundance between cells (often determined by scRNA seq), variability of fluorescence in single cells (reviewed in Eling et al , ) or simply the inappropriate re‐expression of genes (Burgold et al , ). Similarly, the effect of miRNAs in controlling noise has been based on artificial synthetic systems or analysis of static measurements (Li et al , ; Siciliano et al , ; Schmiedel et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tested primitive streak-like induction in response to activin and GSK3 inhibition (Burgold et al, 2019). We observed substantially higher induction of mesendoderm surface markers and gene expression from FS cells than from EpiSCs ( Fig.…”
Section: Germline and Somatic Lineage Induction In Vitromentioning
confidence: 97%
“…NuRD is implicated in gene silencing, but also gene activation ( Gnanapragasam et al, 2011 ). It is essential for cell cycle progression ( Polo et al, 2010 ), DNA damage response ( Larsen et al, 2010 ; Smeenk et al, 2010 ), establishment of heterochromatin ( Sims and Wade, 2011 ), and differentiation ( Bornelöv et al, 2018 ; Burgold et al, 2019 ). In addition, CHD4 is part of the heterotrimeric ChAHP complex that is also involved in gene repression ( Ostapcuk et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%