2013
DOI: 10.1177/0142723713510997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Norwegian Communicative Development Inventories: Reliability, main developmental trends and gender differences

Abstract: We are grateful to the CDI Advisory Board for permission to adapt the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Inventories to Norwegian. We thank Master of linguistics Kristin Wium for drafting the first version of the Norwegian CDI, PhD (linguistics) Janne von Koss Torkildsen, Lars Smith, and Stephen von Tetzchner, professors of psychology at the University of Oslo, for evaluating the first draft, and Masters of linguistics Eli Anne Eiesland and Laila Yvonne Henriksen for serving as COMMUNICATIVE SKILLS IN NORWEGIAN CHI… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
122
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
16
122
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in accordance with findings for other languages (Bleses et al, 2008;Fenson et al, 2007;Fenson et al, 2000;Hamilton et al, 2000;Jackson-Maldonado et al, 2013;Kern, 2007;Pérez-Pereira & Resches, 2007;Simonsen et al, 2014). For vocabulary production, ceiling effects were observed only after 27 months and exclusively at the top half of the distribution, similar to trends reported in short form data for American English, Spanish and Galician.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These findings are in accordance with findings for other languages (Bleses et al, 2008;Fenson et al, 2007;Fenson et al, 2000;Hamilton et al, 2000;Jackson-Maldonado et al, 2013;Kern, 2007;Pérez-Pereira & Resches, 2007;Simonsen et al, 2014). For vocabulary production, ceiling effects were observed only after 27 months and exclusively at the top half of the distribution, similar to trends reported in short form data for American English, Spanish and Galician.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This study provides an in-depth investigation of the growth curves of vocabulary and grammar, examines their interplay, and tests the effects of potential predictors on the trajectories, namely child gender and socioeconomic status (SES). These predictors were selected for inclusion given prior evidence in the literature that both are associated with the nature of child language development during the years of early childhood (Hoff, 2003(Hoff, , 2013Simonsen, Kristoffersen, Bleses, Wehberg, & Jørgensen, 2014). We are particularly interested in determining whether there is linear growth in these trajectories or whether, as some have theorized, there is deceleration in growth as children get older.…”
Section: Modeling the Nature Of Grammar And Vocabulary Trajectories Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned, the variation in language outcomes may also be linked to the country of origin, the child's age at adoption (Roberts & Scott, 2009;Loman et al, 2009), pre-adoption conditions (Mason & Narad, 2005), health factors (Glennen, 2002;Tirella et al, 2006), and the abrupt change of language and culture (Hwa-Froelich & Matsuo, 2010). In addition, many children are adopted when they are between 1 and 4 years, ages when typically developed children are in the middle of their language development (Saxton, 2010;Simonsen, Kristoffersen, Bleses, Wehberg, & Jørgensen, 2014). Hence, the abrupt language shift they experience could theoretically make them more vulnerable for developmental divergence in the acquisition of a second first language.…”
Section: Language Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive academic language proficiency (Cummins, 2008) is an important prerequisite for later literacy development and academic achievement (Tomblin, Zang, Buckwalter, & Catts, 2000;Simonsen et al, 2014). Both academic language skills and development of reading skills put higher demands on children's oral language competence compared to what is necessary to interact socially, and early language problems in children represent risks for later reading problems (Bishop & Snowling, 2004;Kahmi & Catts, 2012).…”
Section: Literacymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation