Shipping in Arctic Waters 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16790-4_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Northeast, Northwest and Transpolar Passages in comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much of the current Arctic shipping is destinational, and most of the ships sail under the Russian flag, indicating that international interest is currently small in comparison [ Keil , ]. While tanker traffic across the NSR has increased, data obtained from the Association of Arctic Expedition Cruise Operators indicate that the number of cruise passengers visiting two of the Arctic's main tourist hubs, Svalbard and Greenland, has been stable for the last 5–6 years, after a substantial increase of 14% per year between 2001 and 2008 [ Jørgensen–Dahl and Wergeland , ] but with a significant continued growth potential [ Østereng , ]. While the vessels navigating the Arctic sea routes, in particular the NSR, save time and money from the shorter distance, much of the gains is currently lost to the costs associated with paying for ice breaker support, high insurance, and investments in ice‐strengthened ships for a relatively short season for the polar sea routes.…”
Section: Sea Ice Change and Human Societymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Much of the current Arctic shipping is destinational, and most of the ships sail under the Russian flag, indicating that international interest is currently small in comparison [ Keil , ]. While tanker traffic across the NSR has increased, data obtained from the Association of Arctic Expedition Cruise Operators indicate that the number of cruise passengers visiting two of the Arctic's main tourist hubs, Svalbard and Greenland, has been stable for the last 5–6 years, after a substantial increase of 14% per year between 2001 and 2008 [ Jørgensen–Dahl and Wergeland , ] but with a significant continued growth potential [ Østereng , ]. While the vessels navigating the Arctic sea routes, in particular the NSR, save time and money from the shorter distance, much of the gains is currently lost to the costs associated with paying for ice breaker support, high insurance, and investments in ice‐strengthened ships for a relatively short season for the polar sea routes.…”
Section: Sea Ice Change and Human Societymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…By nature, transit traffic does not have to come through the Arctic, therefore it is necessarily in direct competition with other alternative routes. In addition, there are three main shipping routes through the Arctic joining the Atlantic and the Pacific basins: the northwest passage through the Canadian archipelago; the northeast passage along the Russian coasts; a route directly across the Arctic Ocean towards the pole is also conceivable, it is called the transpolar route (Lasserre 2010b; Stephenson and Smith 2012; Østreng and others 2013; Stephenson and others 2014) although it remains hypothetical for the present time because of large volumes of sea ice remaining at the minimum extent in September. The Arctic bridge is a sea lane between Murmansk and Churchill (Manitoba, Canada) that has been used by a few ships since 2007, and that was designed to boost traffic from the port of Churchill, active since 1931.…”
Section: Types Of Commercial Shipping Traffic In the Arcticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between 1995 and 2002 legal arrangements foresaw a fixed ice-breaking fee only for cabotage whereas for import/export voyages and transit a practice of negotiated tariff with service provider was in place (Buyanov 2004). In 2009, the German-based Beluga Shipping's project cargo carriers paid only around USD 2.5 per DWT for high-valued project cargoes (Østreng and others 2013). Based on correspondence with Atomflot in 2013, the applicable fees for bulk and liquid cargo shipments were on a level of USD 5 per tonne of cargo and in ballast USD 2.5 per tonne of a ship's full displacement.…”
Section: The Negotiated Nsr Tariff Practicementioning
confidence: 99%