2015
DOI: 10.1017/s0032247415000479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of Russian ice-breaking tariff policy on the northern sea route 1991–2014

Abstract: In recent years, interest in the economic potential of the Arctic has been mounting, facilitated by environmental developments caused by climate change. In this context, the viability of shipping in Arctic waters is pivotal. This article explores the interplay of market considerations and the non-market drivers (climatic, navigational and political components) regarding the viability of the most prominent Arctic shipping route, the northern sea route (NSR), as a global shipping route. In particular, it concent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before 2003, the Russian NSR tariff was subsidized by authorities for ice-breaking aid, but it was then raised to an average of 23 USD per ton of cargo [18]. Taking into account the Russian government's intent in making the Arctic sea routes more competitive, that rate has been constantly adjusted [41]. Starting in July 2017, the Russian NSR administration adopted a much simpler toll calculation (similar to the Suez Canal transit fees) to calculate the fee, and ship owners can get an official tariff quotation by simply entering the gross tonnage (GT) of the ship, the zones the ship intends to sail through, the ice-breaking class, and the expected time of sailing (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before 2003, the Russian NSR tariff was subsidized by authorities for ice-breaking aid, but it was then raised to an average of 23 USD per ton of cargo [18]. Taking into account the Russian government's intent in making the Arctic sea routes more competitive, that rate has been constantly adjusted [41]. Starting in July 2017, the Russian NSR administration adopted a much simpler toll calculation (similar to the Suez Canal transit fees) to calculate the fee, and ship owners can get an official tariff quotation by simply entering the gross tonnage (GT) of the ship, the zones the ship intends to sail through, the ice-breaking class, and the expected time of sailing (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those, which refer to the official NSRA fees, and those, which refer to discounts, offered in particular cases from time to time. This discrepancy stems from the fact that transit fees have been subject to fluctuations related to financial and geostrategic reasons rather than a well-targeted policy during the period 1991-2013 (Gritsenko and Kiiski, 2016). Several studies emphasise the importance of relatively low ice breaking fees in order for the Arctic routes to be viable (Liu and Kronbak, 2010, Lasserre, 2014, 2015, Furuichi and Otsuka, 2015.…”
Section: Route Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies emphasise the importance of relatively low ice breaking fees in order for the Arctic routes to be viable (Liu and Kronbak, 2010, Lasserre, 2014, 2015, Furuichi and Otsuka, 2015. On the other hand, the fact that ice-breaking assistance is not compulsory since 2012 and the recent improvements on navigational rules implemented in 2014 are remedies to the aforementioned obstacles (Gritsenko and Kiiski, 2016).…”
Section: Route Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, research has targeted, for example, the impact of climate change and opening the Arctic route (e.g. Somanathan et al 2007;Parsons et al 2011;Gritsenko and Kiiski 2015;Dalaklis et al 2018) and operational safety (Boström and Österman 2017), whereas optimal pricing research has focussed on fairways or ports (e.g. Coase 1974;Haralambides et al 2001;Meersman et al 2010), while further economic analysis has been limited to the cost-benefit analysis of icebreaker improvements (Lyridis et al 2005).…”
Section: Administration Annual Report 2017)mentioning
confidence: 99%