2010
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2010.49387426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Normalization of Deviant Organizational Practices: Wage Arrears in Russia, 1991–98

Abstract: We apply a normalization of deviance model to understand the prevalence of the illegal practice of wage arrears, the delayed payment of wages, in Russia during the 1990s. The normalization literature proposes that organizational deviance may be self-reinforcing, such that initial acts of organizational deviance may induce additional deviations from formal standards of appropriate behavior. Based on this perspective, we hypothesize that the frequent adoption of a deviant practice within a community will make it… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, it is necessary to understand the relationship that takes place between the initial perpetrator of a fraudulent act and any additional conspirators. Research on the perpetuation of fraud in organizations has focused on diffusion (Strang and Soule, 1998;Baker and Faulkner, 2003), social networking (Brass, Butterfield, and Skaggs, 1998) and the normalization of deviant practices (Earle, Spicer and Peter, 2010). While each of these studies has enhanced our understanding of fraud in organizations, there remains a significant gap in our knowledge regarding how individuals are influenced to join a fraudulent scheme.…”
Section: Collusion Between Perpetratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, it is necessary to understand the relationship that takes place between the initial perpetrator of a fraudulent act and any additional conspirators. Research on the perpetuation of fraud in organizations has focused on diffusion (Strang and Soule, 1998;Baker and Faulkner, 2003), social networking (Brass, Butterfield, and Skaggs, 1998) and the normalization of deviant practices (Earle, Spicer and Peter, 2010). While each of these studies has enhanced our understanding of fraud in organizations, there remains a significant gap in our knowledge regarding how individuals are influenced to join a fraudulent scheme.…”
Section: Collusion Between Perpetratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, what constitutes CSR in a country with a history of non-payment of taxes, wages (Earle, Spice, and Peter, 2010) and corruption (Holmes, 2008), is likely to be different from that where fiscal and regulatory compliance was taken for granted.…”
Section: The Russian Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jamali & Mirshak (2007) note that where tax evasion, corruption and fraud are commonplace, a responsible company is one that complies with the law and codes of conduct, rather than going beyond them. Against the background of corruption, lack of regulatory enforcement and tax fraud that dominated the early part of the transition process (Earle et al, 2010;Holmes, 2008), it is not surprising that some firms asserted their social responsibility through regulatory compliance, as illustrated by the following discourse:…”
Section: Transition Legacy and Coercionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to make this contribution, I first review a stream of literature in the management field that examines the role of ''normalization'' processes in the emergence and maintenance of corrupt business practices (Ashforth and Anand, 2003;Brief et al, 2001;Earle et al, 2010;Ermann and Lundman, 2002;Palmer, 2008;Pinto et al, 2008). This research, like integrative social contracts theory (ISCT), examines the ethical characteristics of organizations and communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%