1988
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420180402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The norm of internality in the explanation of psychological events

Abstract: m e norm of internality is defined as a social valorization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
93
0
27

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(30 reference statements)
4
93
0
27
Order By: Relevance
“…What is suggested herein is that lay theories and ideological beliefs may justify the present distribution of social value in a more subtle way by entailing systematic differences in the use of different types of internal attributions, i.e. the attributions held to be normative in evaluation contexts in western societies (Beauvois & Dubois, 1988;Jellison & Green, 1981). The internal attribution-types particularly appraised in these contexts are ability and effort (Graham, 1994;Weiner, 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is suggested herein is that lay theories and ideological beliefs may justify the present distribution of social value in a more subtle way by entailing systematic differences in the use of different types of internal attributions, i.e. the attributions held to be normative in evaluation contexts in western societies (Beauvois & Dubois, 1988;Jellison & Green, 1981). The internal attribution-types particularly appraised in these contexts are ability and effort (Graham, 1994;Weiner, 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A autora concluiu, assim, que tais diferenças se deviam às diferentes concepções de pessoa compartilhadas pelos dois grupos culturais, isto é, que o erro fundamental de atribuição seria característico das culturas ocidentais, e não de todas as culturas, dada a forte crença que mantêm no valor da responsabilidade pessoal (Jellison & Green, 1981), do exercício de controle sobre os eventos e os comportamentos (Forgas, Furnham & Frey, 1990) ou da observância da norma social da internalidade (Beauvois & Dubois, 1988). A tendência em favor de atribuições internas estaria, assim, em consonância com o individualismo que predomina nessas culturas.…”
unclassified
“…Toutefois, si l'individu contemporain est contraint d'agir de plus en plus «en son propre nom», c'est-à-dire en tant qu'individu, cela ne veut pas dire forcément qu'il est plus autonome 38 , mais plutôt qu'il est soumis à de nouvelles règles sociales qui régulent sa conduite, tout particulièrement à la généralisation de la «norme d'autonomie» 39 . S'il est vrai que la normativité sociale s'est profondément transformée, il demeure néanmoins C'est l'une des raisons pour lesquelles, dans le domaine de la santé mentale, le sujet (client, usager, groupe spécifique, etc.)…”
Section: Grand Renfermementunclassified