2006
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.776651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Non-Monotonicity of Value-at-Risk and the Validity of Risk Measures over Different Horizons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Treussard (2006); Nguyen et al (2012), we consider Y (t) = S 0 e rt − S(t) as the loss variable whose spectral risk we want to calculate using Definition 2.4. If Y (t) is positive (negative), then the stock performs poorly (well), in comparison with the risk-free deposit.…”
Section: Spectral Risk Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following Treussard (2006); Nguyen et al (2012), we consider Y (t) = S 0 e rt − S(t) as the loss variable whose spectral risk we want to calculate using Definition 2.4. If Y (t) is positive (negative), then the stock performs poorly (well), in comparison with the risk-free deposit.…”
Section: Spectral Risk Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Treussard (2006); Nguyen et al (2012), we consider the risk of holding a stock rather than a risk-free deposit over time. More precisely, we analyze the spectral risk measure (Acerbi 2002) of the loss variable Y (t) = S 0 e rt − S(t).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%