2001
DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0101-18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The New Uncertainty Principle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach may superficially appear to be consistent with an undisputed tenet of science, namely, transparently disclosing all sources of uncertainty. That, in turn, would appear to be an outgrowth of the movement to apply the ''precautionary principle'' to wildlife conservation, an appealing if controversial approach that has been applied largely to pollution, pesticides, and genetic engineering (Foster et al 2000, Appell 2001). Although we sympathize with the objectives of those promoting such an approach, we find it lacking as a basis for good conservation decisions.…”
Section: Concluding Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach may superficially appear to be consistent with an undisputed tenet of science, namely, transparently disclosing all sources of uncertainty. That, in turn, would appear to be an outgrowth of the movement to apply the ''precautionary principle'' to wildlife conservation, an appealing if controversial approach that has been applied largely to pollution, pesticides, and genetic engineering (Foster et al 2000, Appell 2001). Although we sympathize with the objectives of those promoting such an approach, we find it lacking as a basis for good conservation decisions.…”
Section: Concluding Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Europe, GMOs are present in many products sold in the supermarkets, and officially imported from abroad. At the moment, GM-planted fields are allowed only for experimental trials since European Union opted for the application "Precaution Principle" (Comm., 0001), which states that whenever (Appell, 2001):…”
Section: The Debate On Gmosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it is fair to ask, as Appell does, "Is the precautionary principle consistent with science, which after all can never prove a negative?" 5 Tukker observed that "parties on both sides simply caricature each other's position: precaution would lead to a standstill of all innovation . .…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and make a commitment "to devote their energies and talents to the most pressing problems of the day, in proportion to their importance, in exchange for public funding". 5 Nevertheless, the buck has to stop somewhere and as Yach concludes, "Putting prevention first requires political courage . .…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%