2003
DOI: 10.1136/ip.9.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanding the precautionary principle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The precautionary principle states that ''when there is suspected harm and the scientific evidence is inconclusive, the prescribed course of action is precautionary action.'' 99 An example of where this principle could be used is youth ice hockey. There is mounting nonexperimental evidence that body checking at the Pee Wee level is harmful, 58-61 so we ask, why should minor hockey expose children to this risk?…”
Section: Who Should Be Responsible For the Prevention Of Injury In Yomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precautionary principle states that ''when there is suspected harm and the scientific evidence is inconclusive, the prescribed course of action is precautionary action.'' 99 An example of where this principle could be used is youth ice hockey. There is mounting nonexperimental evidence that body checking at the Pee Wee level is harmful, 58-61 so we ask, why should minor hockey expose children to this risk?…”
Section: Who Should Be Responsible For the Prevention Of Injury In Yomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the number of injuries sustained in minor hockey, the age at which bodychecking is introduced should be raised. Based on the existing evidence, and the precautionary principle, 15 this move would protect children from serious and potentially permanent injury. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36,37 This reflects the 'precautionary principle' which "shifts the burden of proof … to requiring proof of absence of negative consequences in order to allow an action". [38][39][40] If this were to come aboutand the findings of this study indicate that it may be the only alternative to currently unsuccessful strategies -Canadians of all ages would be better protected against numerous and often serious product-related injuries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%