2002
DOI: 10.3189/172756402781817941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The new remote-sensing-derived Swiss glacier inventory: I. Methods

Abstract: A new Swiss glacier inventory is to be compiled from satellite data for the year 2000. The study presented here describes two major tasks: an accuracy assessment of different methods for glacier classification with Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) data and a digital elevation model (DEM); the geographical information system (GIS)-based methods for automatic extraction of individual glaciers from classified satellite data and the computation of three-dimensional glacier parameters (such as minimum, maximum and medi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
279
3
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 405 publications
(313 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
18
279
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This conforms to the pattern in other regions of Himalaya (Raina and Srivastava, 2008;Bajracharya and Shrestha, 2011;Frey et al, 2012), Tibet, Western Canada or the Alps (e.g. Kääb et al, 2002;Bolch et al, 2010a, b). The mean size of glaciers in the study area is 1.4 km 2 which is slightly higher than the glacierized basins of Ganga (1.1 km 2 ) and Brahmaputra (1.2 km 2 ) (Bajracharya and Shrestha, 2011).…”
Section: Glacier Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This conforms to the pattern in other regions of Himalaya (Raina and Srivastava, 2008;Bajracharya and Shrestha, 2011;Frey et al, 2012), Tibet, Western Canada or the Alps (e.g. Kääb et al, 2002;Bolch et al, 2010a, b). The mean size of glaciers in the study area is 1.4 km 2 which is slightly higher than the glacierized basins of Ganga (1.1 km 2 ) and Brahmaputra (1.2 km 2 ) (Bajracharya and Shrestha, 2011).…”
Section: Glacier Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Based on 1962 Corona and 2006 QuickBird imagery, we found an overall negative glacier surface area loss of 0.5 ± 0.2 % yr −1 since 1962, in agreement with those noted in other studies in the Himalaya. The area loss rates reported here are lower than the average rate of 0.7 % yr −1 reported in other glacierized areas of the world such as the Alps (Kääb et al, 2002), the Tien Shan (Bolch, 2007) and the Peruvian Andes (Racoviteanu et al, 2008a). Glaciers exhibit heterogeneous patterns of area change depending on topographic and climatic factors, most notably glacier altitude (maximum, median, altitudinal range), glacier size, slope and aspect.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Selection of a representative subset of glaciers for a region is difficult, especially when glacier change is assessed over multiple epochs. Most studies of glacier change note increased scatter of percent area change for smaller glaciers (Serandbrei-Barbero et al, 1999;Kääb et al, 2001;Paul, 2002;Paul et al, 2004;DeBeer and Sharp, 2007;Andreassen et al, 2008;Bolch et al, 2010;Paul and Andreassen, 2009). This scatter may arise from the influence of local topographic factors (DeBeer and Sharp, 2007;Paul and Andreassen, 2009).…”
Section: Regional Representativenessmentioning
confidence: 99%