2011
DOI: 10.1108/02756661111100328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The new meaning of customer value: a systemic perspective

Abstract: PurposeToday, as services and products are becoming increasingly intertwined and the competition increasingly global, delivering customer value is not as simple as it used to be. In this article, we suggest that in contemporary business environment customer value is often systemic by nature. This means that managers need to assess their firm's offering through systems‐thinking perspective in order to find out what are the most effective ways to create value for the customer.Design/methodology/approachEvidence … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the term 'the systemic nature of customer value' in this study to describe this modern service-based value-creation environment (Lusch et al, 2010;Pynnönen et al, 2011). In a nutshell, this reflects the fact that the value delivered is dependent on more than one attribute, and possibly on more than one firm (Pynnönen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use the term 'the systemic nature of customer value' in this study to describe this modern service-based value-creation environment (Lusch et al, 2010;Pynnönen et al, 2011). In a nutshell, this reflects the fact that the value delivered is dependent on more than one attribute, and possibly on more than one firm (Pynnönen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freel, 2006;Martinez-Fernandez, 2010;Tether & Hipp, 2002;Von Nordenflycht, 2010). The service offerings tend to consist of a broad range of value-creating elements that tap into a variety of customer needs (Pynnönen, Ritala, & Hallikas, 2011). Moreover, as the value of a service is typically defined in a process of co-creation between the provider and the customer (Bettencourt, Ostrom, Brown, & Roundtree, 2002;Vargo & Lusch, 2008), service firms should attend to the specification and design of the contents in order to maintain competitiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Value is created when the benefits of a strategic activity exceed the cost [37]. All the definitions acknowledge that value is strictly related to customer perception of the benefit as opposed to the offering itself and the features [5,7,23].…”
Section: Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, customer value is delivered through a system consisting of various types of actors that contribute to the customer value either directly or indirectly (see e.g., Allee, 2000;Kothandaraman and Wilson, 2001;Pynnönen et al, 2011). In coopetition, customer value creation is an essential element, since in its absence coopetition can resemble a cartel-like collusive behaviour that may be harmful for customers and overall innovativeness (for discussion, see e.g., Gnyawali et al, 2008;Bengtsson et al, 2010).…”
Section: Value Network Approach To Coopetitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, the representations generated using this modelling framework can serve as proofs of concepts for showing the possibility of designing the network structure capable of addressing the challenges inherent in coopetition. In addition, the models could be combined with more detailed value creation and capture analyses used in value network literature (e.g., Allee, 2000;Pynnönen et al, 2011), thereby shedding more light on the incentives behind the development of coopetitive initiatives.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%