PID Controller Design Approaches - Theory, Tuning and Application to Frontier Areas 2012
DOI: 10.5772/34670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The New Design Strategy on PID Controllers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We could only confirm that the SAF implements a proportional-derivative (PD) control of the steering in that both (i) the direct values of parameters and (ii) their derivatives are incorporated in its code. The only integral term included in the terminal set of the GP-the integral of the lateral deviation-is not incorporated by the GP in the best-evolved SAF, which is consonant with the findings that the integral term could be obsolete in some nonlinear PID controllers [27].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We could only confirm that the SAF implements a proportional-derivative (PD) control of the steering in that both (i) the direct values of parameters and (ii) their derivatives are incorporated in its code. The only integral term included in the terminal set of the GP-the integral of the lateral deviation-is not incorporated by the GP in the best-evolved SAF, which is consonant with the findings that the integral term could be obsolete in some nonlinear PID controllers [27].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Moreover, even if we assume that it is possible to handcraft the code (applying various top-down, theoretical approaches based on vehicle dynamics [25,27,28]) of a more complex, nonlinear PID SAF that controls the steering of an unstable, skidding car in such a way so it regains its stability in a more effective way than the simple PD and PID controllers based on the servo-control model, neither the…”
Section: Evolving the Steering Controller Via Gpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the performance based on using other methods ( [14], [22]), the time taking for the stability reduces from 5 second to 2 second.…”
Section: B Simulation Examplesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The control output, u of this generalized continuous-form PID control function, has a distinct signal path to the reference set-point r and the output tracked signal y as illustrated in Figure 2. This kind of control structure exhibits the separation principle [10,45] that the design problems of set-point tracking and robustness plus disturbance rejection can be achieved independently and at the same time in a control law [4,46]. Simplifying (2) by assuming λ p , λ i , λ d = 1 and rearranging, the result is a compact PID structure given by (7d) and illustrated in Figure 2.…”
Section: Critic Pid Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compute ω n using (42), our approach is to encode the fuzzy behaviour of the optimal response of the closed PID-loop model with changing b and c as a fuzzy inference system (FIS), defined by (44), and synthesized as a fuzzy basis function (FBF) [8] defined in (45). This method is used to automatically compute the appropriate x s or x pk with respect to the inputs b and c respectively.…”
Section: Setting ω N By Fuzzy Inference Of the Closed Pid-loop Responsementioning
confidence: 99%