No abstract

No abstract

Aims The aim of this study was to validate the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/systolic pulmonary artery (PA) pressure (TAPSE/PASP) ratio with the invasive pressure–volume (PV) loop-derived end-systolic right ventricular (RV) elastance/PA elastance (Ees/Ea) ratio in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) and secondary pulmonary hypertension (PH). Methods and results The relationship of TAPSE and TAPSE/PASP with RV-PV loop (single-beat)-derived contractility Ees, afterload Ea, and Ees/Ea was assessed in 110 patients with HFREF with and without secondary PH. The results were compared with other surrogate parameters such as the fractional area change/PASP ratio. The association of the surrogates with all-cause mortality was evaluated. In patients with PH (n = 74, 67%), TAPSE significantly correlated with Ees (r = 0.356), inverse with Ea (r = −0.514) but was most closely associated with Ees/Ea (r = 0.77). Placing TAPSE in a ratio with PASP slightly reduced the relationship to Ees/Ea (r = 0.71) but was more closely related to the parameters of PA vascular load, diastolic RV function, and RV energetics. The area under the curve of TAPSE/PASP and TAPSE for discriminating overall survival in receiver operating characteristic analysis was not different (P = 0.78. Prognostic relevant cut-offs were 17 mm for TAPSE and 0.38 mm/mmHg for TAPSE/PASP. Both parameters in multivariate cox regression remained independently prognostically relevant. Conclusion TAPSE is an easily and reliably obtainable and valid surrogate parameter for RV–PA coupling in PH due to HFREF. Putting TAPSE into a ratio with PASP did not further improve the coupling information or prognostic assessment. Trial Identifier DRKS—German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00011133; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00011133).

No abstract

Aims Failure of right ventricular (RV) function worsens outcome in pulmonary hypertension (PH). The adaptation of RV contractility to afterload, the RV-pulmonary artery (PA) coupling, is defined by the ratio of RV end-systolic to PA elastances (Ees/Ea). Using pressure-volume loop (PV-L) technique we aimed to identify an Ees/Ea cut-off predictive for overall survival and to assess hemodynamic and morphologic conditions for adapted RV function in secondary PH due to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF). Methods and resultsThis post hoc analysis is based on 112 patients of the prospective Magdeburger Resynchronization Responder Trial. All patients underwent right and left heart echocardiography and a baseline PV-L and RV catheter measurement. A subgroup of patients (n = 50) without a pre-implanted cardiac device underwent magnetic resonance imaging at baseline. The analysis revealed that 0.68 is an optimal Ees/Ea cut-off (area under the curve: 0.697, P < 0.001) predictive for overall survival (median follow up = 4.7 years, Ees/Ea ≥ 0.68 vs. <0.68, log-rank 8.9, P = 0.003). In patients with PH (n = 76, 68%) multivariate Cox regression demonstrated the independent prognostic value of RV-Ees/Ea in PH patients (hazard ratio 0.2, P < 0.038). Patients without PH (n = 36, 32%) and those with PH but RV-Ees/Ea ≥ 0.68 showed comparable RV-Ees/Ea ratios (0.88 vs. 0.9, P = 0.39), RV size/function, and survival. In contrast, secondary PH with RV-PA coupling ratio Ees/Ea < 0.68 corresponded extremely close to cut-off values that define RV dilatation/remodelling (RV end-diastolic volume >160 mL, RV-mass/volume-ratio ≤0.37 g/mL) and dysfunction (right ventricular ejection fraction <38%, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion <16 mm, fractional area change <42%, and stroke-volume/end-systolic volume ratio <0.59) and is associated with a dramatically increased short and medium-term all-cause mortality. Independent predictors of prognostically unfavourable RV-PA coupling (Ees/Ea < 0.68) in secondary PH were a pre-existent dilated RV [end-diastolic volume >171 mL, odds ratio (OR) 0.96, P = 0.021], high pulsatile load (PA compliance <2.3 mL/mmHg, OR 8.6, P = 0.003), and advanced systolic left heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction <30%, OR 1.23, P = 0.028). Conclusions The RV-PA coupling ratio Ees/Ea predicts overall survival in PH due to HFREF and is mainly affected by pulsatile load, RV remodelling, and left ventricular dysfunction. Prognostically favourable coupling (RV-Ees/Ea ≥ 0.68) in PH was associated with preserved RV size/function and mid-term survival, comparable with HFREF without PH.