2000
DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x00002399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area

Abstract: A new view of the functional role of the left anterior cortex in language use is proposed. The experimental record indicates that most human linguistic abilities are not localized in this region. In particular, most of syntax (long thought to be there) is not located in Broca's area and its vicinity (operculum, insula, and subjacent white matter). This cerebral region, implicated in Broca's aphasia, does have a role in syntactic processing, but a highly specific one: It is the neural home to receptive mechanis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

37
547
11
28

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 848 publications
(623 citation statements)
references
References 192 publications
(151 reference statements)
37
547
11
28
Order By: Relevance
“…They also fit with the general Ôsubject-firstÕ strategy that has been shown for such patients in English, German, Italian, and Dutch, as well as for normal subjects working under perceptual or attentional loads (Strube, 1996;Vos, Gunter, Kolk, & Mulder, 2001a;Vos, Gunter, Schriefers, & Friederici, 2001b). The specific result for German object clefts is especially interesting in light of a current controversy on the nature and causes of receptive agrammatism (Friederici & Gorrell, 1998;Grodzinsky, 2000). Based on results for English, it has been argued that aphasic patients (whose results we have simulated here) find it difficult to process non-canonical word order configurations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…They also fit with the general Ôsubject-firstÕ strategy that has been shown for such patients in English, German, Italian, and Dutch, as well as for normal subjects working under perceptual or attentional loads (Strube, 1996;Vos, Gunter, Kolk, & Mulder, 2001a;Vos, Gunter, Schriefers, & Friederici, 2001b). The specific result for German object clefts is especially interesting in light of a current controversy on the nature and causes of receptive agrammatism (Friederici & Gorrell, 1998;Grodzinsky, 2000). Based on results for English, it has been argued that aphasic patients (whose results we have simulated here) find it difficult to process non-canonical word order configurations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…A morphological left-over-right asymmetry was found for BA44, but not for BA45 (Amunts et al, 1999). Broca's area was shown to be involved in syntactic processes in a number of neuropsychological studies, in particular in that patients with lesions including Broca's area clearly suffering from syntactic deficits (Grodzinski, 2000;Caplan and Waters, 1999). In addition, some recent brain imaging studies have demonstrated increased hemodynamic activity in Broca's area during the processing of syntactic aspects during language comprehension (Dapretto and Bookheimer, 1999;Embick et al, 2000;Friederici et al, 2000a;Just et al, 1996;Moro et al, 2001;Tettamanti et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same is shown by the fact that the free accusative is not involved in processes of argument reassignment as in passive constructions, see (17). (17). *Der ganze Tag wurde von Anna repariert.…”
Section: (16) *Anna Reparierte Das Motorrad Den Tagmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…But our feeling that this interpretation is derived fast and effortlessly should not obscure the fact that much information processing has to be performed by our brains in order to achieve it. Accordingly, this central issue has led to many studies in both psycholinguistics (see [15], for an overview) as well as aphasiology (see [17], for an overview). In order to characterize this type of information more closely, we will consider a sentence such as (2), which can immediately be judged to be unacceptable in English.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%