2013
DOI: 10.1037/npe0000016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neuroeconomics of voting: Neural evidence of different sources of utility in voting.

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To set the cluster extent threshold at a meaningful value, we used the cp_cluster_Pthresh 2 tool, which offers a nonarbitrary uncorrected threshold and cluster extent equal to p < .2 corrected for multiple comparisons (Family-Wise Error [FWE]) across the whole brain. In this case, the threshold resulted in values of p < .001 with a cluster ( k ) = 8, similar approach to those adopted by Bischoff, Neuhaus, Trautner, and Weber (2013) and Cascio, O’Donnell, Bayer, Tinney, and Falk (2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…To set the cluster extent threshold at a meaningful value, we used the cp_cluster_Pthresh 2 tool, which offers a nonarbitrary uncorrected threshold and cluster extent equal to p < .2 corrected for multiple comparisons (Family-Wise Error [FWE]) across the whole brain. In this case, the threshold resulted in values of p < .001 with a cluster ( k ) = 8, similar approach to those adopted by Bischoff, Neuhaus, Trautner, and Weber (2013) and Cascio, O’Donnell, Bayer, Tinney, and Falk (2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…We believe that studies in strategic management are receptive to the neurokinetic domains and tools and are being used to deepen behavioral issues that challenge management knowledge, such as employee training, leadership, learning and organizational behavior (McDonald, 2018). For example, the identification of emotional influences on decision-making (Dulleck et al , 2011) and the existence of biased beliefs to the phenomena (Bischoff et al , 2013) are some conclusions of studies that have used these tools in research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that studies in strategic management are receptive to neurokinetic domains and tools and are being used to deepen behavioral issues that challenge management knowledge, such as employee training, leadership, learning, and organizational behavior . The identification of emotional influences on decision making (Dulleck et al, 2011), the existence of biased beliefs to the phenomena (Bischoff et al, 2013) are some studies that have used these tools in research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%