2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The network substrate of confabulatory tendencies in Alzheimer's disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results seem to suggest that confabulations are not directly related to damage of a single brain area, but rather have a complex neuroanatomical origin. This is in line with recent studies which have linked the confabulation tendency in AD patients to the impairment of complex circuits between different hubs, particularly between the right prefrontal cortex and the mediotemporal regions involved in memory retrieval (Venneri et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results seem to suggest that confabulations are not directly related to damage of a single brain area, but rather have a complex neuroanatomical origin. This is in line with recent studies which have linked the confabulation tendency in AD patients to the impairment of complex circuits between different hubs, particularly between the right prefrontal cortex and the mediotemporal regions involved in memory retrieval (Venneri et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A decreased connectivity between the posterior (precuneus and posterior cingulate cortex) and anterior (anterior cingulate cortex and medial prefrontal cortex) regions of the DMN has been already associated with AD (Mohan et al, 2016). According to recent evidences, the insufficient suppression of the DMN during cognitive tasks is responsible for the inability to distinguish accurate information from the irrelevant ones during the process of memory retrieval, thus contributing to generate confabulations (Venneri et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of the three remaining identified studies employed a different functional neuroimaging technique including connectivity analysis using resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) (Venneri et al, 2017), positron emission tomography (PET) using the 18 Ffluoro-2-deoxyglucose ( 18 FDG) tracer (Desgranges et al, 2002) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using the 123 I N -isopropyl-p-iodoamphetamine (IMP) tracer (Reed et al, 1993).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data for the fMRI connectivity analysis conducted by Venneri et al (2017) were acquired at two different sites. In Italy, 18 participants had two resting-state fMRI echoplanar sequences (voxel dimensions 3.28x3.28x6.0mm) and a complementary 3D anatomical T1-weighted scan (1.1x1.1x6mm voxels) acquired on a 1.5T scanner.…”
Section: Fmri Connectivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The confabulator, by definition, does not have a pre-simulated story that could indicate the ability of the LPFC to ascertain control over the posterior cortex. Confabulatory tendencies are often interpreted as an indicator of a disconnection between PFC and the posterior cortex 121 . 5) Many people report the experience of reading aloud a book to a child and thinking of something else.…”
Section: Is There a Neurological Dissociation Between Language And Comentioning
confidence: 99%