2018
DOI: 10.1109/jiot.2018.2823978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Network As a Computer: A Framework for Distributed Computing Over IoT Mesh Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, traditional simulation protocols are tested over standalone battery-operated devices in terms of energy memory and execution of time [22]. Further, to utilize the computing power of IoT devices, Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) are used for simultaneous data transfer in order to reduce latency and improve network lifetime [23]. To summarize, a comparison of IoT simulation frameworks is presented in Table II.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, traditional simulation protocols are tested over standalone battery-operated devices in terms of energy memory and execution of time [22]. Further, to utilize the computing power of IoT devices, Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) are used for simultaneous data transfer in order to reduce latency and improve network lifetime [23]. To summarize, a comparison of IoT simulation frameworks is presented in Table II.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the drawbacks of WSNs with centralized architectures deployed in large-scale monitoring applications are enormous bandwidth requirement and huge energy consumption as periodic transmission of raw data over long distances, via multiple hops to the base station leads to fast depletion of sensor node’s battery and shortens the lifespan of a WSN [ 7 , 9 , 10 ]. Other drawbacks include low reliability, longer response time, high bandwidth cost, low level data security and privacy [ 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Some works in the literature have demonstrated the feasibility of distributed computing in WSN and its promises of gain in performance and lower power consumption [ 5 , 7 , 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other drawbacks include low reliability, longer response time, high bandwidth cost, low level data security and privacy [ 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Some works in the literature have demonstrated the feasibility of distributed computing in WSN and its promises of gain in performance and lower power consumption [ 5 , 7 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. By performing more local computation, limiting exchanges only between neighboring nodes and reducing the number of messages that need to be transmitted, distributed computing in WSN has the potential of providing a solution to the drawbacks of the centralized approach [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors based their study on one of the forms of wireless networks; namely, MESH networks [16,17]. These networks are particularly widely used in Internet of Things (IoT) type infrastructure; i.e., to ensure connectivity of sensor systems or communication in computer networks of the ad hoc type [18][19][20][21]. They can be used both in general access networks (networks in parks, on the streets, the natural environment, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%