1983
DOI: 10.1016/0301-6226(83)90033-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The net energy value of diets for growth in pigs in relation to the fermentative processes in the digestive tract and the site of absorption of the nutrients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Micronization, therefore, resulted in an increase in the digestion and absorption of energy in the small intestine and a decrease of microbial fermentation of energy in the large intestine. This shift in the disappearance of energy from the large to the small intestine should also result in an improvement in the efficiency of energy utilization, as was shown by Just et al (1983) in studies with growing pigs fed diets differing in fibre content. Irrespective of whether the MHB + SBM or HB + SBM diet was fed, starch escaping digestion in the small intestine was nearly completely fermented by the microflora in the large intestine (Tables 4 and 5), which was also observed in studies by Sauer et al (1977) and Fadel et al (1989).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Micronization, therefore, resulted in an increase in the digestion and absorption of energy in the small intestine and a decrease of microbial fermentation of energy in the large intestine. This shift in the disappearance of energy from the large to the small intestine should also result in an improvement in the efficiency of energy utilization, as was shown by Just et al (1983) in studies with growing pigs fed diets differing in fibre content. Irrespective of whether the MHB + SBM or HB + SBM diet was fed, starch escaping digestion in the small intestine was nearly completely fermented by the microflora in the large intestine (Tables 4 and 5), which was also observed in studies by Sauer et al (1977) and Fadel et al (1989).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The proportion of NE derived from the ME fraction originating from fermentative digestion was shown to be low in pigs, compared with other ME sources (Just et al, 1983;Noblet et al, 1994). Thus, dietary fibre content and digestion were important sources of variation in the NE/ME ratio of diets and feedstuffs for pigs (Noblet et al, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears from these reviews that the number of studies devoted to NE calculation was much more limited in poultry than in ruminants or pigs. In ruminants or pigs, the interest in using NE instead of DE or ME comes from the fact that the NE/DE or NE/ME ratios are affected by the extent of fibre digestion (Jarrige, 1980;Just et al, 1983;Noblet et al, 1994). In poultry, the extent of fibre digestion is very low (Carré et al, 1990), which would decrease variations in NE/ME ratios and thus, would reduce the interest of an NE system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various researchers have observed negative correlations between dietary fiber levels and the utilization of ME for body energy retention in growing pigs [11,12,17], implying increased HP associated with increasing levels of fiber and, as a result, with intake of indigestible material. In contrast, in other studies no negative effects of including a fiber source in the diet on the utilization of ME for body energy retention were observed [14,21,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%