2006
DOI: 10.1080/01647950608684442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neotype ofPediculaster mesembrinae(Canestrini, 1881) (Acari: Siteroptidae) and the description of all life stages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, it should be taken into account that pygmephorid females and the youngest instars of sciarids have similar body size. Body length of females of P. mesembrinae ranges from 0.17 to 0.25 mm (Hussey et al 1969; Camerik et al 2006), whereas body length of the first larval instar of sciarids ranges from 0.36 to 1.40 mm (Lewandowski et al 2004). In addition, life table parameters (Table 5) and fecundity (Table 4) suggest that, phorid larvae put aside, P. mesembrinae was the worst type of food also for females of P. bituberosus , even though the size of prey was not so important for adults of the predator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, it should be taken into account that pygmephorid females and the youngest instars of sciarids have similar body size. Body length of females of P. mesembrinae ranges from 0.17 to 0.25 mm (Hussey et al 1969; Camerik et al 2006), whereas body length of the first larval instar of sciarids ranges from 0.36 to 1.40 mm (Lewandowski et al 2004). In addition, life table parameters (Table 5) and fecundity (Table 4) suggest that, phorid larvae put aside, P. mesembrinae was the worst type of food also for females of P. bituberosus , even though the size of prey was not so important for adults of the predator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genus Pediculaster was redefined by its Neotype by Camerik et al (2006). In that publication, the identification by J. Cooreman of the mites on slide T74 was rejected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some pygmephorid genera are characterized by the presence of two different forms of females: phoretic and non-phoretic, which differ considerably in terms of morphology. The phenomenon of female dimorphism is well described for the genus Pediculaster Vitzthum (see Camerik et al 2006). Dimorphic females are also known in the genus Pediculitopsis Mahunka, 1970, which is poorly described.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%