The need to restore generative identity in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology: Development and psychometric validation of the fertility reparation inventory

Abstract

Objective This study described the development and psychometric evaluation of the fertility reparation inventory, providing measures of manic and expiatory reparation as symbolic dynamics of restoring one's procreative and generative identity through Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). Methods Two cross‐sectional studies were conducted on female patients undergoing ART (N = 150) and women from the general population (N = 250), respectively. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis assessed construct validity and reliability. Pearson's bivariate correlations were used to provide convergent evidence of validity with omnipotence, perceived infertility‐related stress, anxiety, depression, need for reparation, fear of punishment, and hope. Results The results confirmed a two‐factor solution of the 12‐item instrument, with adequate fit, a very good internal consistency, and well‐supported forms of convergent validity. Conclusion This study provides a meaningful psychodynamic contribution, in both theoretical and empirical terms, for the understanding of emotional dynamics and psychological issues underlying the demand for ART.

Toward a Personalized Psychological Counseling Service in Assisted Reproductive Technology Centers: A Qualitative Analysis of Couples’ Needs

“…In this direction, some studies have shed light on the information regarding the needs of couples facing ART treatment [ 24 , 28 ]. In fact, most infertility patients do not seem to have a deep understanding of the therapeutic treatments and their success rates, which often leads them to develop unrealistic expectations with respect to success and a strong sense of dissatisfaction after treatment failure [ 29 , 30 , 35 ]. Communication with fertility clinic staff is also very important for patients, who require listening, understanding, empathy, and a clear, nonjudgmental, honest interaction [ 24 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 36 ].…”