The need to be unique and the innovative behavior: The moderating role of supervisor support

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the moderating effect of supervisor support on the relationship between the need to be unique and the innovative behavior. People not only strive to belong to a group but also want to be unique from others and feel exceptional. Individuals’ innovative behavior is one of the things that makes them feel different from other people. Because developing a new idea, supporting this idea, putting this idea into practice, and the positive achievements of this idea distinguish people who exhibit innovative behavior from others. It depends on the behavior of supervisors whether people who break away from typical practices and procedures to feel unique and special continue to act in innovative ways. In this context, it is vitally essential for supervisors to support people who display innovative behavior. The research was conducted on employees working in the education sector in Mersin. We employed the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine the fitness of the model and moderation was tested. As hypothesized, the need to be unique had a significant and positive effect on innovative behavior. This finding is consistent with existing literature and thus advance knowledge on need to be unique and innovative behavior, particular in education sector. Nonetheless, it has been determined that supervisor support doesn’t have a moderator role on the relationship between the need to be unique and innovative behavior. Although there are some researches in the literature on consumer experiences about the need to be unique and innovative behavior, but literature on education section is sparse and still long way to go to evaluate its’ reflections on the workplace.

Impact of perceived supervisor support and leader-member exchange on employees’ intention to leave in public sector museums: A parallel mediation approach

“…Employees are likely to indulge in OCB when they feel strong team support. As a result, employees are ready to invest a significant amount of effort on behalf of their members by providing novel ideas and taking initiatives that may benefit the organizational growth and progress (Tuan et al, 2021;Bekmezci et al, 2022). It further indicates that a supportive organizational structure fulfills the needs of staff consciousness, which could lead to a connection between POS and OCB, which may result in establishing employees' voluntary behavior that leads to proper job expectations (Han et al, 2018).…”

Affiliate performance feedback and technology innovation: The mediating effect of the parent’s response

“…Attention refers to “the noticing, encoding, interpreting, and focusing of time and effort by organizational decision-makers” ( Ocasio, 1997 , p.189). Identifying the driving factors of attention distribution helps in exploring the influence of parent functions, as the parent firm guides affiliates’ strategic decisions according to its level of attention ( Belenzon et al, 2019 ; Dutt and Joseph, 2019 ; Rhee et al, 2019 ; Bekmezci et al, 2022 ; Busenbark et al, 2022 ). Owing to bounded rationality ( Simon, 1947 ), the attention capability is limited and the parent firm cannot similarly focus on all affiliates ( Dutt and Joseph, 2019 ; Rhee et al, 2019 ; Eklund and Mannor, 2021 ).…”