2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01293-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The need for regulation in the practice of human assisted reproduction in Mexico. An overview of the regulations in the rest of the world

Abstract: Background The emergence of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in humans has been an important tool for the treatment of infertility. The number of treatments performed in Latin America has been increasing, and Mexico is the third country with the most assisted reproduction cycles performed in the region. However, Mexico lacks a national regulation for assisted reproduction. Therefore, it is necessary to implement regulations that allow for a safe clinical practice based on ethics which can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regulations should be in place before the inclusion and implementation of ART in the health system. In fact, few studies cited that the regulatory component for assisted reproduction is often overlooked or missing, despite the provision of ART [ 57 , 58 ]. Moreover, ART clinics usually adopt their own rules, which leads to different standards of care [ 59 ], contributes to inequality in access, and may facilitate professional liberty, with medical protocols not always in line with evidence-based standards or adapted to the needs of patients [ 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulations should be in place before the inclusion and implementation of ART in the health system. In fact, few studies cited that the regulatory component for assisted reproduction is often overlooked or missing, despite the provision of ART [ 57 , 58 ]. Moreover, ART clinics usually adopt their own rules, which leads to different standards of care [ 59 ], contributes to inequality in access, and may facilitate professional liberty, with medical protocols not always in line with evidence-based standards or adapted to the needs of patients [ 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%