1985
DOI: 10.1093/icb/25.1.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Need for a Standard Approach to Taxonomic Descriptions of Nemerteans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
96
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
96
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Gibson 1985;Roe et al 2007), proposed that histological features should not be included as a prerequisite to describe/ redescribe new nemertean fauna and that they instead should only be used to address questions about internal organ systems functionality and evolution. To support this statement, Strand et al (2013) suggested that there is no strong evidence that nemertean identifications are more accurate when based on internal features, rather than in external.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gibson 1985;Roe et al 2007), proposed that histological features should not be included as a prerequisite to describe/ redescribe new nemertean fauna and that they instead should only be used to address questions about internal organ systems functionality and evolution. To support this statement, Strand et al (2013) suggested that there is no strong evidence that nemertean identifications are more accurate when based on internal features, rather than in external.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When establishing the heteronemertean Pseudomicrura afzelii Strand and Sundberg, 2011, these authors proposed a new standard in nemertean species description. It is based on external features and DNA sequences, without examination of internal anatomy by serial histological sections, a methodology that has been traditionally employed in nemertean systematics (e.g., Gibson, 1985). Strand and Sundberg (2011) advocated that description of internal morphology is not only useless in inferring phylogeny (at least within certain subgroups of the phylum, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although cladistic validity of Gibson's (1985b) family groupings has been challenged (Schwartz andNorenburg 2001, Sundberg et al 2009), for practical purposes the species belongs to Gibson's (1985b) Group E, in having a branched proboscis; yet it possesses a combination of characters that ex− cludes it from any of the genera within this group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%