The need for a complex systems approach in rural health research

Abstract

On a global scale, many major rural health issues have persisted for decades despite the introduction of new health interventions and public health policies. Although research efforts have generated valuable new knowledge about the aetiology of health, disease and health inequities in rural communities, rural health systems remain to be some of the most deprived and challenged in both the developing and developed world. While the reasons for this are many, a significant factor contributing to the current state of play is the pressing need for methodological innovation and relevant scientific approaches that have the capacity to support the translation of novel solutions into ‘real world’ rural contexts. Fortunately, complex systems approaches, which have seen an increase in popularity in the wider public health literature, could provide answers to some of the most resilient rural health problems in recent times. The purpose of this article is to promote the value and utility of a complex systems approach in rural health research. We explain the benefits of a complex systems approach and provide a background to the complexity sciences, including the main characteristics of complex systems. Two popular computational methods are described. The next step for rural health research involves exploring how a complex systems approach can help with the identification and evaluation of new and existing solutions to policy-resistant rural health issues. This includes generating awareness around the analytical trade-offs that occur between the use of traditional scientific methods and complex systems approaches.

From Deficit to Strength-Based Aboriginal Health Research – Learning from those Who Flourish

“…Perhaps most importantly, Aboriginal people exist within, and are part of, a broader system and the imperative and development of agency -as more than passive entities buffeted by forces outside of our control -is as vital to desired wellbeing outcomes as our efforts toward systemic change. It is likely only through this model that we then can move to a further expansion of the earlier example of resilience -that of the establishment of systems that facilitate and support the dismantling of highly resilient problems [59].…”

From Deficit to Strength-Based Aboriginal Health Research—Moving toward Flourishing

“…Given this, we emphasise the utility of pluralism, an openness to multiple ways of seeing, understanding, improving, and solving challenges faced [ 77 ]. We suggest that the world is too varied, too changed for simplistic dichotomous thinking to further the wellbeing of populations.…”

A sufficient pipeline of doctors for rural communities is vital for Australia's overall medical workforce

“…The evidence on what influences medical graduates to pursue non‐metropolitan careers has been accumulating over several decades 4 . The best understanding is that a systems approach is required — an alchemy that combines the various factors known to enhance rural career choice 5 . Putting aside remuneration and other incentives, a systems design in medical training must consider the full pathway from medical school applications through to GP and non‐GP specialist careers 4,6 …”