2013
DOI: 10.3959/1536-1098-69.1.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Need and Means To Update Chronologies In A Dynamic Environment

Abstract: The International Tree-Ring Data Bank (ITRDB) provides public access to over 3000 tree-ring data sets collected over the past century, yet 809 of these sites have end dates between AD 1950 and 1980. These data cannot be calibrated with at least the past 30-40 years of instrumental data when used in climate reconstructions. We developed new tree-ring data sets at five sites in Maine, USA, to update earlier collections. Four of the five collections were successfully updated, with environmental changes at the fif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, more than three quarters of the ITRDB chronologies do not extend beyond the year 2000 [ 4 ]. This and the lack of spatial representativity could have negative consequences for paleoclimatic investigations, in addition to precluding the integration of tree-ring width data with the increasingly available data from instrumental weather stations, remote sensing, national forest inventories, and other in situ measurements of forest growth [ 4 , 19 ]. Moreover, tree-ring data are mostly distributed in North America and Europe, focusing on marginal growing environments selected to maximize the climatic signal, and the selective sampling of the biggest trees within populations (with the aim of producing long chronologies) often leads to bias in archived datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, more than three quarters of the ITRDB chronologies do not extend beyond the year 2000 [ 4 ]. This and the lack of spatial representativity could have negative consequences for paleoclimatic investigations, in addition to precluding the integration of tree-ring width data with the increasingly available data from instrumental weather stations, remote sensing, national forest inventories, and other in situ measurements of forest growth [ 4 , 19 ]. Moreover, tree-ring data are mostly distributed in North America and Europe, focusing on marginal growing environments selected to maximize the climatic signal, and the selective sampling of the biggest trees within populations (with the aim of producing long chronologies) often leads to bias in archived datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to changes in the density of the tree-ring network of the ITRDB and the use of a large radius (450 km) to reconstruct drought for the LBDA, soil moisture variability at small or local scales is potentially absent in areas that are underrepresented in the tree-ring network. Further, many of the chronologies that are available on the ITRDB were collected in the 1980s and have not been updated (Larson et al 2013;Zhao et al,2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in the drought signal recorded by tree rings have been established only recently (Larson et al, 2013;Maxwell et al, 2015Maxwell et al, , 2016Maxwell et al, , 2019Helcoski et al, 2019), making an investigation of its causes essential to ensuring the interpretability of tree-ring-based hydroclimate reconstructions. Of these recent studies, Maxwell et al (2016) provided the first documentation of an apparent deteriorating relationship between radial tree growth and summer soil moisture that is not accompanied by an increase in signal strength during another season.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative consequences of this decline in data availability for palaeoclimatological research and the need to regularly update existing chronologies have already been noted 7 . Here, we emphasize that the low coverage of tree-ring data from diverse geographic and climatic space over the past decade is limiting opportunities to integrate the global tree-ring network with newer observation platforms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, EO records are still problematically short-term when the aim is to study the full range of ecosystem variability, especially in the context of long-term climate change. If sufficient spatiotemporal coverage can be achieved and maintained 7 , tree-ring records offer opportunities to contextualize EO data by reflecting climate-or disturbanceinduced tree-growth anomalies over decades to centuries. Further opportunities emerge from integration of tree rings with (1) canopy variability observed from of tree growth through sub-annual tree-ring studies 6 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%