2014
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nebular emission of star-forming galaxies in a hierarchical universe

Abstract: Galaxy surveys targeting emission lines are characterising the evolution of star-forming galaxies, but there is still little theoretical progress in modelling their physical properties. We predict nebular emission from star-forming galaxies within a cosmological galaxy formation model. Emission lines are computed by combining the semi-analytical model SAG with the photoionisation code MAPPINGS-III. We characterise the interstellar medium (ISM) of galaxies by relating the ionisation parameter of gas in galaxies… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
92
4
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
3
92
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the GP14 and OR14 models reproduce the evolution of the Hα LF reasonably well (Lagos et al 2014;Orsi et al 2014). The Hα is a recombination line and thus, its unattenuated luminosity is directly proportional to the Lyman continuum, which is a direct prediction of the semi-analytical models.…”
Section: Comparison To Semi-analytical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both the GP14 and OR14 models reproduce the evolution of the Hα LF reasonably well (Lagos et al 2014;Orsi et al 2014). The Hα is a recombination line and thus, its unattenuated luminosity is directly proportional to the Lyman continuum, which is a direct prediction of the semi-analytical models.…”
Section: Comparison To Semi-analytical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Here, we compare our observations to predictions from both the Gonzalez-Perez et al (2014) flavor of the  model (hereafter GP14) and the Orsi et al (2014) flavor of the  model (hereafter OR14). Both models follow the physical processes that shape the formation and evolution of galaxies, including 1. the collapse and merging of dark matter haloes; 2. the shock-heating and radiative cooling of gas inside dark matter haloes, leading to the formation of galaxy discs; 3. star formation bursts that can be triggered by either mergers or disk instabilities; 4. quiescent star formation in galaxy discs which in the OR14 model is assumed to be proportional to the total amount of cold gas, while in the GP14 model it takes into account both the atomic and molecular components of the gas (Lagos et al 2011); 5. the growth of super massive black holes in galaxies; 6. feedback from supernovae, from AGNs and from photoionization of the intergalactic medium; 7. chemical enrichment of the stars and gas; 8. galaxy mergers driven by dynamical friction within common dark matter haloes, leading to the formation of stellar spheroids.…”
Section: Comparison To Semi-analytical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here we further predict the [N II] 205 μm LFs at higher redshifts using the method described below. We will also compare our results with those from simulations given by Orsi et al (2014), and those derived with the method presented in Spinoglio et al (2012a).…”
Section: Local Star Formation Rate Densitymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It is important to constrain the LF of the [N II] emission locally since now it becomes possible to build a large sample for studying the [N II] LF at high redshift using modern facilities such as ALMA. The local [N II] LF can serve as a benchmark necessary for observational and theoretical (e.g., Orsi et al 2014) studies on its evolution. Given the unprecedented sensitivity of Herschel at ∼200 μm, and the large number of galaxies in the local universe already observed, for the first time we can derive the local [N II] LF (see Section 3.2), using a bivariate method and by utilizing the local IR LF, which has been studied extensively in the literature with IRAS observations (e.g., Soifer et al 1986;Sanders et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%