2018
DOI: 10.4193/rhinol/18.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nasal cycle: a comprehensive review

Abstract: Background: The nasal cycle is the spontaneous, reciprocal congestion and decongestion of the nasal mucosa during the day and it is present in almost 70-80% of healthy adults. The German physician Richard Kayser first described it in 1895. Since then, the number of papers focused on this fascinating issue has continued to flourish. Main body: Even though there are a high number of publications on this topic, the understanding of nasal cycle is still very poor. The present review tries to offer a comprehensive … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
37
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The typical awake freely breathing respiration rates are~0.1-0.3 Hz in humans and~1-3 Hz in mice [18][19][20] . The flow of air in one nostril is greater than the other because there is a slight turbinate swelling in one nostril that switches between the nostrils every few hours [21][22][23][24][25] . The nasal cavity is a complex organ containing several passages and turbinates.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Olfactory Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical awake freely breathing respiration rates are~0.1-0.3 Hz in humans and~1-3 Hz in mice [18][19][20] . The flow of air in one nostril is greater than the other because there is a slight turbinate swelling in one nostril that switches between the nostrils every few hours [21][22][23][24][25] . The nasal cavity is a complex organ containing several passages and turbinates.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Olfactory Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, given that mucosal congestion is capable of blocking the nasal airway lumen (Soane et al, ), Yokley () has convincingly argued that fully decongested morphology likely represents the functional state under natural selection, as it represents the maximum potential airway dimensions achievable by an individual. Indeed, it is widely accepted that the nasal cycle—the reciprocal alternation of congestion/decongestion between the left and right nasal passages—permits the mucosa of the congested nasal passage to recuperate while the patent decongested side performs the majority of the respiratory air‐conditioning (Eccles, , ; Hasegawa & Kern, ; Pendolino, Lund, Nardello, & Ottaviano, ). As decongested nasal mucosa is typically less than 0.5 mm thick (Beule, ), the morphology of the bony turbinate alone is generally accepted to provide a reliable proxy for its in vivo anatomy at full decongestion (HeuzĂ©, ; Yokley, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this is implausible, the most likely explanation for this is artefacts affecting the signal within any of the ROIs, including the reference ROIs and the ROIs in the CSF, nasal mucosa and brain parenchyma. www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Diurnal volume fluctuations of the nasal mucosa derive from dilation and constriction of the venous cavernous tissue in the turbinates 42 . Therefore, ROI locations had to be manually adapted to local volume changes to avoid misregistration and partial volume effects from adjacent regions, particularly from the airways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%