2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nanoscale geometry of TiO2 nanotubes influences the osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells by modulating H3K4 trimethylation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
110
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 45 Furthermore, we found that RBP2 expression was down-regulated in hASCs in contact with TiO 2 nanotubes. 46 We therefore asked whether single-layer graphene would also influence the behavior of MSCs through epigenetic regulation?…”
Section: Epigenetic Mechanism Of Graphene On Osteogenic Differentiatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 45 Furthermore, we found that RBP2 expression was down-regulated in hASCs in contact with TiO 2 nanotubes. 46 We therefore asked whether single-layer graphene would also influence the behavior of MSCs through epigenetic regulation?…”
Section: Epigenetic Mechanism Of Graphene On Osteogenic Differentiatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] In the past decade, design and fabrication of nanostructured titania and titanate layers on titanium have attracted much attention because of the improved biological performance of titanium and its widespread application in bone implants. [14][15][16][17][18] Generally,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also shown that TiO 2 nanotubes of 70 nm in diameter were the optimal dimension for the osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells. They were also shown to stimulate methylation of histone H3 at lysine 4 (H3K4) in the promoter of Runx2 and osteocalcin 44 . These results indicate that there is an optimal nanotopological diameter, which facilitates transcriptional activation for osteogenic differentiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%