2015
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2015.1045964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nano-Particle Mass Classifier (Nano-PMC): Development, Characterization, and Application for Determining the Mass, Apparent Density, and Shape of Particles with Masses Down to the Zeptogram Range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar experimental technique coupling the H-TDMA and APM was first introduced by McMurry et al (2002) for investigating urban atmospheric aerosol, and Pagels et al (2009) used another similar experimental scheme to examine the transformation of soot particle morphology. In addition, the tandem DMA-APM technique was usually applied for determining apparent density and dynamic shape factors of dry nonspherical particles (Park et al 2004;Geller et al 2006;Charvet et al 2014;Broßell et al 2015). The details of the two subsystems are introduced in the following subsections.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar experimental technique coupling the H-TDMA and APM was first introduced by McMurry et al (2002) for investigating urban atmospheric aerosol, and Pagels et al (2009) used another similar experimental scheme to examine the transformation of soot particle morphology. In addition, the tandem DMA-APM technique was usually applied for determining apparent density and dynamic shape factors of dry nonspherical particles (Park et al 2004;Geller et al 2006;Charvet et al 2014;Broßell et al 2015). The details of the two subsystems are introduced in the following subsections.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding classable mass ranged from 0.001 to 1000 femtograms (fg, 10 ¡15 g), and a size range of 58-5759 nm assuming spherical unit density particles. In an improved design with higher rotation speeds, known as nanoparticle mass classifier (Nano-PMC) developed by Broßell et al (2015), the masses of classified particles can be down to 20 zeptograms (zg, 10 ¡21 g). Moreover, APM was operated at a constant rotational speed, and the particle concentrations at the APM outlet were then measured using a CPC (TSI 3022A) at discrete applying voltages; that is, system response spectrum (C N ¡ V) (Tajima et al 2011).…”
Section: H-dma-apmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported that m APM was lower than m pre;d mob for Polystyrene Latex (PSL), sodium chlorides (NaCl), and Santovac oil droplets for nanoparticles smaller than 30 nm and up to 12 nm (Santovac oil droplets) (Tajima et al 2011;2013). Similar underestimation was also observed in the test with the Nano-PMC (Broßell et al 2015). Figure 1 summarizes the experimental results reported in the literatures and the PSL data measured in the present work, which clearly shows that the mass ratio of m APM to m pre;d mob decreases with decreasing particle size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The system is accurate for 50-800 nm aerosols (McMurry et al 2002;Tajima et al 2011;2013, Rawat et al 2016). The couette centrifugal particle mass analyzer (CPMA) and nano-particle mass classifier (Nano-PMC), also apply the same classifying principle as the APM but have different mechanical designs (Olfert and Collings 2005;Broßell et al 2015). Although previous study had presented a laboratory method with a tandem DMA-impactor system for sub-10 nm nanoparticles (Fern andez de la Mora et al 2003), the single aerosol mass measurement for sub-50 nm nanoparticles is still limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For partially dispersed CNT materials, these densities are unknown. Future experiments will aim at characterizing aerosols using a so-called nano-particle mass classifier (nano-PMC) that was developed recently (Broßell et al 2015 ). In combination with a differential mass analyzer, it allows measuring the mass and density of aerosol particles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%