1990
DOI: 10.1016/0920-5632(90)90526-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The NA31 ϵ'/ϵ measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
28
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter diagrams play also a substantial role in the CP violating ratio ε ′ /ε. The most recent experimental results for this ratio, Re(ε ′ /ε) =    (28.0 ± 4.1) · 10 −4 (KTeV) [1] (18.5 ± 7.3) · 10 −4 (NA48) [2] (1) are in the ball park of the earlier result of the NA31 collaboration at CERN, (23.0 ± 6.5) · 10 −4 [3], and substantially higher than the value of E731 at Fermilab, (7.4 ± 5.9) · 10 −4 [4]. The grand average (according to the PDG recipe) including NA31, E731, KTeV and NA48 results, reads…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The latter diagrams play also a substantial role in the CP violating ratio ε ′ /ε. The most recent experimental results for this ratio, Re(ε ′ /ε) =    (28.0 ± 4.1) · 10 −4 (KTeV) [1] (18.5 ± 7.3) · 10 −4 (NA48) [2] (1) are in the ball park of the earlier result of the NA31 collaboration at CERN, (23.0 ± 6.5) · 10 −4 [3], and substantially higher than the value of E731 at Fermilab, (7.4 ± 5.9) · 10 −4 [4]. The grand average (according to the PDG recipe) including NA31, E731, KTeV and NA48 results, reads…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…I. Our result on the form factor for the K L → γℓ + ℓ − decays seems to prefer to the data [50,51] from the K L → γe + e − decay. Therefore our values of the form factor near the threshold of the K L → γµ + µ − decay are considerably larger than the data from Ref.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…(43) and A(K L → γγ) in Eq. (50) and using | π + |H w |K + | ≃ 1.99m 2 K × 10 −7 , we can reproduce the values of (∆m K ) pole /Γ K S in Eq. (55) and Γ(K L → γγ) expt (i) forr 0 ≃ 0.535 andα K * ≃ 2.61 with B K = 1.0, (ii) for r 0 ≃ 0.635 andα K * ≃ 2.34 with B K = 0.75 and (iii) forr 0 ≃ 0.715 andα K * ≃ 2.15 with B K = 0.50.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recent confirmation of direct CP violation in K → ππ decays is an important step in testing the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) mechanism for CP violation in the Standard Model. Combining the recent measurements by the KTeV and NA48 experiments [1] with earlier results from NA31 and E731 [2] gives Re (ǫ ′ /ǫ) = (2.12 ± 0.46) × 10 −3 . This value tends to be higher than theoretical predictions in the Standard Model, which center below or around 1 × 10 −3 [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%