2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-009-9097-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mystery of cognitive structure and how we can detect it: tracking the development of cognitive structures over time

Abstract: Many research studies have clearly demonstrated the importance of cognitive structures as the building blocks of meaningful learning and retention of instructional materials. Identifying the learners' cognitive structures will help instructors to organize materials, identify knowledge gaps, and relate new materials to existing slots or anchors within the learners' cognitive structures. The purpose of our empirical investigation is to track the development of cognitive structures over time. Accordingly, we demo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
79
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(44 reference statements)
2
79
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the method to probe the MCS, the concept map method was considered as the most convenient and effective commonly at present (Novak, 1998;Liu, 1994;Ruiz-Primo & Shavelson, 1997), because it could show clearly not only the quantity of knowledge and their connections, but also the integral organization of all knowledge (Preece, 1976;Zhang and Chen, 2000;Tsai, 2001;Ifenthaler et al, 2001). However, it was obviously inconvenient to conduct quantitative analysis (Zhang and Chen, 2000;Ifenthaler et al, 2001).…”
Section: Contribution Of This Paper To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for the method to probe the MCS, the concept map method was considered as the most convenient and effective commonly at present (Novak, 1998;Liu, 1994;Ruiz-Primo & Shavelson, 1997), because it could show clearly not only the quantity of knowledge and their connections, but also the integral organization of all knowledge (Preece, 1976;Zhang and Chen, 2000;Tsai, 2001;Ifenthaler et al, 2001). However, it was obviously inconvenient to conduct quantitative analysis (Zhang and Chen, 2000;Ifenthaler et al, 2001).…”
Section: Contribution Of This Paper To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was obviously inconvenient to conduct quantitative analysis (Zhang and Chen, 2000;Ifenthaler et al, 2001). So the researchers developed some new methods, such as flow-map method (Anderson and Demetrius, 1993) , the technique of "establishment by the subject" (Liu, 1994;Enger, 1996;Ruiz-Primo & Shavelson, 1997;Ruiz-Primo et al, 2001;Lavigne, 2005;Shavelson et al, 2005;Muller et al, 2008;Lindstrom & Sharma, 2011), the method of "Pathfinder Associative Networks" (Casas et al, 2011;Geeslin & Shavelson, 1975;Jonssen et al, 1993;Fenker, 1975;Preece, 1976;Wainer & Kaye, 1974), and the method with HIMATT (Ifenthaler, 2011).…”
Section: Contribution Of This Paper To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of applying a fine-grained analysis of changes in cognitive structures (e.g., Ifenthaler et al 2009), we use a (highly powered) regression approach. Specifically, we analyze data from more than 70,000 exams written by almost 3,000 advanced law students at the Faculty of Law at the University of Münster.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A maioria das pesquisas sobre os MCs se concentra no campo da educação e ensino (sobretudo no ensino de ciências). Elas podem ser organizadas em quatro categorias: avaliação (CICU-TO; CORREIA, 2012;HAY, 2007;HILBERT;RENKL, 2008;HAY;ADAMS, 2000;NOVAK, 2002;OLIVER, 2009), aprendizagem, (CORREIA; DONNER JR.; INFAN-TE-MALACHIAS, 2008;CAÑAS, 2007;HAY;LYGO-BAKER, 2008;CAÑAS, 2005), cognição (AMADIEU et at., 2009;IFENTHALER;MASDUKI;SEEL, 2011;KARPICKE;BLUNT, 2011) e colaboração (FISCHER et al, 2002;TORRES;MARRIOTT, 2009).…”
unclassified