2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40480-1_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mysterious Whiteboard

Abstract: Abstract. This paper raises the question of why electronic whiteboards are not ubiquitous. The paper provides a design-oriented analysis of traditional as well as electronic whiteboards in the context of collaborative and individual activities. We offer a novel perspective on whiteboards for collaborative activity based on a survey of the electronic whiteboard literature, a series of interviews with users of traditional whiteboards, and concepts rooted in Activity Theory. We identify a number of characteristic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As was shown in the discussion before, multimodal features of WhatsApp were increasingly utilized by the students as an affordance to expand their agency. Recent studies showed that taking pictures of writings on the board using smartphones was the current norm for the students (Klokmose & Bertelsen, 2013;Varona-Marin, 2016). Hence, this phenomenon was not a new practice, and they might have done that long before using WhatsApp, to save time and to be able to focus more attention on what the teachers were saying.…”
Section: Multimodal Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As was shown in the discussion before, multimodal features of WhatsApp were increasingly utilized by the students as an affordance to expand their agency. Recent studies showed that taking pictures of writings on the board using smartphones was the current norm for the students (Klokmose & Bertelsen, 2013;Varona-Marin, 2016). Hence, this phenomenon was not a new practice, and they might have done that long before using WhatsApp, to save time and to be able to focus more attention on what the teachers were saying.…”
Section: Multimodal Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some might be attributed to the manipulability of the artifact (Wakkary and Maestri, 2008, p. 13 make a similar conclusion). For example, the ease with which a whiteboard is appropriated and put to use in a multitude of ways (Klokmose and Bertelsen, 2013;Xiao et al, 2001) would seem less about materially altering the whiteboard itself than how it can bear language and sketches (social manipulability), how we're able to move it around (meta manipulability) and the experience of using a felt-tip pen on the surface (direct manipulability). Malleability is still complicit, however.…”
Section: Appropriationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Mathews et al said, "Activity Theory provides a framework for describing user context…and consequently…a framework for describing how people and peripheral displays interact in various situations" (2007). Klokmose and Bertelsen (2013) analyzed how information on a whiteboard was remediated to and from the whiteboard, and how designing artificial limitations on an electronic whiteboard could help maintain a key quality of a whiteboard-that when content is erased, it is gone. Peña-Ayala et al (2014) defined objects in the learning environment and how they were taken into account to support educational activities.…”
Section: Activity Theory As a Framework For Designmentioning
confidence: 99%