2003
DOI: 10.2307/3647797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mylar Balloon Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The isotensoid was first derived by Taylor (1963) using a direct equilibrium formulation and later by Paulsen (1994) and Mladenov and Oprea (2003) using variational calculus.…”
Section: Lobe Cutting Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isotensoid was first derived by Taylor (1963) using a direct equilibrium formulation and later by Paulsen (1994) and Mladenov and Oprea (2003) using variational calculus.…”
Section: Lobe Cutting Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tension field theory, the minimal mathematical framework to address this problem, has been developed to predict the general shape of initially flat structures. While solutions have been found for axisymmetric convex surfaces (11)(12)(13) and polyhedral structures (14,15), predictions in a general case remain an open issue and have been addressed numerically in the computer graphics community (16). In a seminal paper, Taylor (17) described the shape of an axisymmetric parachute with an unstretchable sail, a solution also appearing in recent studies on the wrapping of droplets with thin polymeric sheets (18-20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which implies the equivalence of the constructability of M * from M and the claimed property of q. The second equation of the theorem follows immediately from (14).…”
Section: Theorem 310mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Despite the simple definition, there is surprisingly little known about surfaces with constant κ 1 /κ 2 , except for κ 1 /κ 2 = ±1, i.e., the sphere and minimal surfaces. Another known case is an ideal Mylar balloon (see e.g., [14,15]) which is obtained by gluing two equally sized discs of flexible, but inextensible, foil along their common border, and blowing it up. This particular surface of revolution has a constant ratio of principal curvatures of κ 1 /κ 2 = 2.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%