1976
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4165(76)90051-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The murine sublingual and submandibular mucins their isolation and characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major mucins of adult sublingual glands of rats and mice have been isolated and partially characterized. Based on size, amino acid and carbohydrate composition, and antigenicity, investigators have concluded that the sublingual gland mucin is very different from the mucin found in the seromucous acinar cells of the adult rodent submandibular gland (Moschera and Pigman, 1975;Roukema et al, 1976;Denny and Denny, 1984;Tabak et al, 1985;Culp et al, 1991;Man et al, 1995). Recent comparison of cDNA sequences of mucin transcripts from mouse submandibular and sublingual glands revealed very little homology between the two and confirmed their separate genetic origins (Denny and Denny, unpublished).…”
Section: (2) Perinatal and Adult Protein Phenotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major mucins of adult sublingual glands of rats and mice have been isolated and partially characterized. Based on size, amino acid and carbohydrate composition, and antigenicity, investigators have concluded that the sublingual gland mucin is very different from the mucin found in the seromucous acinar cells of the adult rodent submandibular gland (Moschera and Pigman, 1975;Roukema et al, 1976;Denny and Denny, 1984;Tabak et al, 1985;Culp et al, 1991;Man et al, 1995). Recent comparison of cDNA sequences of mucin transcripts from mouse submandibular and sublingual glands revealed very little homology between the two and confirmed their separate genetic origins (Denny and Denny, unpublished).…”
Section: (2) Perinatal and Adult Protein Phenotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have isolated salivary mucins from human mucous extraparotid saliva and whole saliva by an ultracentrifugation procedure described by Roukema et al [1976]. In this paper we report the influ ence of human salivary mucins on the de mineralization of human dental enamel by citric acid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…About 16 mg dry weight of HWSM (range 12-28 mg) could be isolated from 100 ml CHWS using the ultracentrifuga tion method described by Roukema et al [1976Roukema et al [ , 1982. This is in the same order as reported by Fox et al [1985], who found the average amount of HWSM to be 20 m g /100 ml (range 3-51), suggesting that HWSM comprises the major part of the salivary mucins.…”
Section: Human Whole Saliva As a Source O F Mucinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1974;Hand, 1979;Lima and Haddad, 1981]. In particular, N-acetyl-mannosamine is slowly incorporated by the glycoproteins of the sublin gual gland, despite their high content of sialic acid, into which the mannosamine is converted [sialic acid makes up 30% of the saccharide fraction, which contains 66% of the glycoprotein; Moschera and Pigman, 1975;Roukema et al, 1976]. This is said not to be due to a slow cellular uptake [Nieuw Amerongen et al, 1981]; the possibility of a slow conversion to sialic acid seems more likely and is favored by Nieuw Amerongen et al [1981], however, very little is known about the activities of the enzymes catalyzing these reactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the present report reveal more specific details about the timetable of the intracellular route that the newly synthesized secretory glycoproteins take through the mucous acinar cells of the major sublingual gland. The analysis of the labeling patterns 0.5, 1 and 2 h after the injection of leucine shows that in the mucous acinar cells the bulk of the protein backbone of the secretory products [90% glycoproteins ;Vreugdenhil and Roukema, 1975;Moschera and Pigman, 1975;Roukema et al, 1976;Nieuw Amerongen et al, 1981] has reached the Golgi apparatus within 2 h, just like many other exo crine cells [see Warshawsky et al, 1963;Caro and Palade, 1964;Jamieson and Palade, 1967a, b;Tiber, 1971;Bogart, 1977], The increased number of silver grains over the apical cell regions at 4 h after the injec tion indicates that it takes at least 4 h for a labeled protein to reach the secretion granules. This means a longer time than in any other exocrine cell investigated until now.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%